These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25135324)

  • 1. Smaller pupil size and better proofreading performance with positive than with negative polarity displays.
    Piepenbrock C; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(11):1670-7. PubMed ID: 25135324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive display polarity is particularly advantageous for small character sizes: implications for display design.
    Piepenbrock C; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Hum Factors; 2014 Aug; 56(5):942-51. PubMed ID: 25141597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The advantage of positive text-background polarity is due to high display luminance.
    Buchner A; Mayr S; Brandt M
    Ergonomics; 2009 Jul; 52(7):882-6. PubMed ID: 19562598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of ambient illumination, contrast polarity, and letter size on text legibility under glance-like reading.
    Dobres J; Chahine N; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Apr; 60():68-73. PubMed ID: 28166901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positive display polarity is advantageous for both younger and older adults.
    Piepenbrock C; Mayr S; Mund I; Buchner A
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(7):1116-24. PubMed ID: 23654206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Text - background polarity affects performance irrespective of ambient illumination and colour contrast.
    Buchner A; Baumgartner N
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jul; 50(7):1036-63. PubMed ID: 17510822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of pupil size and peripheral brightness on detection and discrimination performance.
    Mathôt S; Ivanov Y
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e8220. PubMed ID: 31875153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of display factors on Chinese proofreading performance and preferences.
    Chan AH; Ng AW
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(11):1316-30. PubMed ID: 22897680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of line length, line spacing, and line number on proofreading performance and scrolling of Chinese text.
    Chan AH; Tsang SN; Ng AW
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):521-34. PubMed ID: 24930173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Legibility and subjective preference for color combinations in text.
    Pastoor S
    Hum Factors; 1990 Apr; 32(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 2210772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Display Curvature, Presbyopia, and Task Duration on Visual Fatigue, Task Performance, and User Satisfaction.
    Choi D; Kyung G; Nam K; Park S
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):273-287. PubMed ID: 30281334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How display polarity and lighting conditions affect the pupil size of VDT operators.
    Taptagaporn S; Saito S
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 2354697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. After-effects of TFT-LCD display polarity and display colour on the detection of low-contrast objects.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Ergonomics; 2010 Jul; 53(7):914-25. PubMed ID: 20582772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of display polarity and luminance contrast on visual lobe shape characteristics.
    Tsang SN; Chan AH; Yu RF
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1028-42. PubMed ID: 22676836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reading from computer screen versus reading from paper: does it still make a difference?
    Köpper M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Ergonomics; 2016 May; 59(5):615-32. PubMed ID: 26736059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading on LCD vs e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain.
    Siegenthaler E; Bochud Y; Bergamin P; Wurtz P
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 22762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupil size reflects the focus of feature-based attention.
    Binda P; Pereverzeva M; Murray SO
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Dec; 112(12):3046-52. PubMed ID: 25231615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influences of luminance and accommodation stimuli on pupil size and pupil center location.
    Mathur A; Gehrmann J; Atchison DA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(4):2166-72. PubMed ID: 24595386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychology of computer use: XXX. Effects of presentation speed on pupil size using negative and positive CRTS.
    Miyao M; Ishihara S; Ishigaki H; Sugiura T; Matsuura E; Furuta M; Sakata T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Dec; 77(3 Pt 1):979-84. PubMed ID: 8284185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The eye pupil adjusts to imaginary light.
    Laeng B; Sulutvedt U
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):188-97. PubMed ID: 24285432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.