BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25136868)

  • 1. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
    Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
    Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Barker GP; Rush AJ; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30497169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
    Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
    Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
    Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jack RA; Burn MB; McCulloch PC; Liberman SR; Varner KE; Harris JD
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Apr; 102(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28853024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
    Velasco BT; Chien B; Kwon JY; Miller CP
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30795702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rating a Sports Medicine Surgeon's "Quality" in the Modern Era: an Analysis of Popular Physician Online Rating Websites.
    Nwachukwu BU; Adjei J; Trehan SK; Chang B; Amoo-Achampong K; Nguyen JT; Taylor SA; McCormick F; Ranawat AS
    HSS J; 2016 Oct; 12(3):272-277. PubMed ID: 27703422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An online review of plastic surgeons in southern California.
    Lewis P; Kobayashi E; Gupta S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 May; 74 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 25875912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations.
    Donnally CJ; Roth ES; Li DJ; Maguire JA; McCormick JR; Barker GP; Rivera S; Lebwohl NH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1725-1730. PubMed ID: 29975328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
    Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online Surgeon Ratings and Outcomes in Hernia Surgery: An Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative Analysis.
    Haskins IN; Krpata DM; Rosen MJ; Perez AJ; Tastaldi L; Butler RS; Rosenblatt S; Prabhu AS
    J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Nov; 225(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 28838868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors Impacting Online Ratings for Otolaryngologists.
    Calixto NE; Chiao W; Durr ML; Jiang N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Aug; 127(8):521-526. PubMed ID: 29882425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Analysis of Online Ratings of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jay JH; Runge NE; Vergara FH; Sabatini CS; Oni JK
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2021 Oct; 41(9):576-579. PubMed ID: 34387231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Analysis of Online Ratings of Hip and Knee Surgeons.
    Runge NE; Jay JH; Vergara FH; Oni JK
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 May; 35(5):1432-1436. PubMed ID: 31973969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social Media Presence Correlated with Improved Online Review Scores for Spine Surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Pastore MA; Sama AJ; Schiller NC; Li DJ; Bondar KJ; Shenoy K; Spielman AF; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 141():e18-e25. PubMed ID: 32311565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends of online ratings of otolaryngologists: what do your patients really think of you?
    Sobin L; Goyal P
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jul; 140(7):635-8. PubMed ID: 24876073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.