These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25137094)

  • 21. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis?
    Westwood ME; Whiting PF; Kleijnen J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Jun; 5():20. PubMed ID: 15943861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Doing meta-analysis in research: a systematic approach.
    Jain V; Sharma R; Singh S
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2012; 78(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 22565423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review.
    Faggion CM; Huda F; Wasiak J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 24666018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How to conduct a qualitative meta-analysis: Tailoring methods to enhance methodological integrity.
    Levitt HM
    Psychother Res; 2018 May; 28(3):367-378. PubMed ID: 29533169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review".
    Hasan H; Muhammed T; Yu J; Taguchi K; Samargandi OA; Howard AF; Lo AC; Olson R; Goddard K
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 50(Pt A):141-149. PubMed ID: 28915472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Kattan S; Lee SM; Kohli MR; Setzer FC; Karabucak B
    J Endod; 2018 Jan; 44(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 29032820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.
    Jørgensen AW; Hilden J; Gøtzsche PC
    BMJ; 2006 Oct; 333(7572):782. PubMed ID: 17028106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality of meta-analyses in major leading gastroenterology and hepatology journals: A systematic review.
    Liu P; Qiu Y; Qian Y; Chen X; Wang Y; Cui J; Zhai X
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27600190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.
    Lundh A; Knijnenburg SL; Jørgensen AW; van Dalen EC; Kremer LC
    Cancer Treat Rev; 2009 Dec; 35(8):645-52. PubMed ID: 19836897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methodological quality of meta-analyses on the blood pressure response to exercise: a review.
    Johnson BT; MacDonald HV; Bruneau ML; Goldsby TU; Brown JC; Huedo-Medina TB; Pescatello LS
    J Hypertens; 2014 Apr; 32(4):706-23. PubMed ID: 24463936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.
    Jin YH; Wang GH; Sun YR; Li Q; Zhao C; Li G; Si JH; Li Y; Lu C; Shang HC
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e011514. PubMed ID: 28186925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Teaching Lifelong Research Skills in Residency: Implementation and Outcome of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Course.
    Himelhoch S; Edwards S; Ehrenreich M; Luber MP
    J Grad Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 7(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 26457153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are meta-analyses of Chinese herbal medicine trials trustworthy and clinically applicable? A cross-sectional study.
    Chung VC; Ho RS; Wu X; Fung DH; Lai X; Wu JC; Wong SY
    J Ethnopharmacol; 2015 Mar; 162():47-54. PubMed ID: 25554640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Emergent approaches to the meta-analysis of multiple heterogeneous complex interventions.
    Melendez-Torres GJ; Bonell C; Thomas J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jun; 15():47. PubMed ID: 26032785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Epidemiological characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus treatment: a systematic review.
    Wu XY; Lam VC; Yu YF; Ho RS; Feng Y; Wong CH; Yip BH; Tsoi KK; Wong SY; Chung VC
    Eur J Endocrinol; 2016 Nov; 175(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 27491373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
    Moher D; Pham B; Jones A; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Moher M; Tugwell P; Klassen TP
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):609-13. PubMed ID: 9746022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.