These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25137147)

  • 1. The Reliabilities of Radiographic Measurements of Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Ankylosing Spondylitis.
    Shin JK; Lee JS; Kang SS; Lee JM; Youn BH
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Jul; 29(6):E282-7. PubMed ID: 25137147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic measurement reliability of lumbar lordosis in ankylosing spondylitis.
    Lee JS; Goh TS; Park SH; Lee HS; Suh KT
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr; 22(4):813-8. PubMed ID: 23179978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliabilities of and correlations among five standard methods of assessing the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine.
    Ohara A; Miyamoto K; Naganawa T; Matsumoto K; Shimizu K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(22):2585-91; discussion 2592. PubMed ID: 17047548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of lumbar lordosis measurement in patients with spondylolisthesis: a case-control study comparing the Cobb, centroid, and posterior tangent methods.
    Hwang JH; Modi HN; Suh SW; Hong JY; Park YH; Park JH; Yang JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(18):1691-700. PubMed ID: 20543767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Centroid method: an alternative method of determining coronal curvature in scoliosis. A comparative study versus Cobb method in the degenerative spine.
    Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Lee JM; Park SY
    Spine J; 2013 Apr; 13(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 23332390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis.
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Cailliet R; Troyanovich SJ; Janik TJ; Holland B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(16):2072-8. PubMed ID: 10954638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative analysis of 4 curvature measurement methods in early-onset scoliosis.
    Hwang JH; Hong JY; Suh SW; Yang JH; Lee JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(20):E1273-81. PubMed ID: 22739673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of cervical lordosis measurement techniques on long-cassette radiographs.
    Janusz P; Tyrakowski M; Yu H; Siemionow K
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Nov; 25(11):3596-3601. PubMed ID: 26707132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing 6 methods.
    Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Park JH
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Sep; 19(9):1551-7. PubMed ID: 20437183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods.
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Cailliet R; Janik TJ; Holland B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jun; 26(11):E235-42. PubMed ID: 11389407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective lordosis: analysis of sagittal spinal canal alignment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Gwinn DE; Iannotti CA; Benzel EC; Steinmetz MP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 19951018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.
    Park Y; Maeda T; Cho W; Riew KD
    Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19850532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A New Index for Cervical Curvature Evaluation - Relative Cervical Curvature Area.
    Gu J; Wang X; Xiong J; Xiao J; Tian Z; Liu X; Tian Y; Feng W; Du J; Wang F
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Sep; 189():e777-e786. PubMed ID: 38968993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms.
    Hardacker JW; Shuford RF; Capicotto PN; Pryor PW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jul; 22(13):1472-80; discussion 1480. PubMed ID: 9231966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical sagittal alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (Lenke type 1-6).
    Wang L; Liu X
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Mar; 22(2):254-259. PubMed ID: 28025024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical measurements of cervical lordosis using flexirule and inclinometer methods in individuals with and without cervical spine dysfunction: A reliability and validity study.
    McFarland C; Wang-Price S; Richard S
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2015; 28(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 25096317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Reliabilities of Several Measurement Methods of Cervical Sagittal Alignment in Cases with Cervical Spine Rotation Using X-ray Findings in Cervical Spine Disorders.
    Yo K; Tsushima E; Oishi Y; Murase M; Ota S; Matsuda Y; Yamaoki Y; Morihisa R; Uchihira T; Omura T
    Spine Surg Relat Res; 2018; 2(3):186-196. PubMed ID: 31440667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system.
    Ames CP; Smith JS; Eastlack R; Blaskiewicz DJ; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Bess S; Kim HJ; Mundis GM; Klineberg E; Gupta M; O'Brien M; Hostin R; Scheer JK; Protopsaltis TS; Fu KM; Hart R; Albert TJ; Riew KD; Fehlings MG; Deviren V; Lafage V;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):673-83. PubMed ID: 26273762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.
    Tang JA; Scheer JK; Smith JS; Deviren V; Bess S; Hart RA; Lafage V; Shaffrey CI; Schwab F; Ames CP;
    Neurosurgery; 2012 Sep; 71(3):662-9; discussion 669. PubMed ID: 22653395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Analysis of Three Imaging Modalities for Evaluation of Cervical Sagittal Alignment Parameters: A Validity and Reliability Study.
    Lee HD; Jeon CH; Chung NS; Kwon HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):1901-1907. PubMed ID: 28574884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.