272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25138818)
1. Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects.
Mariani L; Maino G; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):43. PubMed ID: 25138818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between direct vs indirect anchorage in two miniscrew-supported distalizing devices.
Cozzani M; Fontana M; Maino G; Maino G; Palpacelli L; Caprioglio A
Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 26222412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchorage plate in adolescents.
Sa'aed NL; Park CO; Bayome M; Park JH; Kim Y; Kook YA
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):657-64. PubMed ID: 25191840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Janson G; de Freitas MR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):58-64. PubMed ID: 24351151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances.
Patel MP; Janson G; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; de Freitas KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 19268832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dento-skeletal effects of the Pendulum Hygienic Distalizer.
Ba-Yazed AH; Hafez AM; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):21-5. PubMed ID: 25745706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.
Kinzinger GS; Gülden N; Yildizhan F; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 19815162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage.
Aslan BI; Kucukkaraca E; Turkoz C; Dincer M
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 23772682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
