These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25140439)

  • 1. Evaluating complex interventions: perspectives and issues for health behaviour change interventions.
    Tarquinio C; Kivits J; Minary L; Coste J; Alla F
    Psychol Health; 2015 Jan; 30(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 25140439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing the risk of bias in health behaviour change trials: improving trial design, reporting or bias assessment criteria? A review and case study.
    de Bruin M; McCambridge J; Prins JM
    Psychol Health; 2015 Jan; 30(1):8-34. PubMed ID: 25112431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Realist RCTs of complex interventions - an oxymoron.
    Marchal B; Westhorp G; Wong G; Van Belle S; Greenhalgh T; Kegels G; Pawson R
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Oct; 94():124-8. PubMed ID: 23850482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of community-based oral health promotion and oral disease prevention--WHO recommendations for improved evidence in public health practice.
    Petersen PE; Kwan S
    Community Dent Health; 2004 Dec; 21(4 Suppl):319-29. PubMed ID: 15617418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating health promotion: a tale of three errors.
    Tones K
    Patient Educ Couns; 2000 Feb; 39(2-3):227-36. PubMed ID: 11040722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of bias in randomised controlled trials of health behaviour change interventions: evidence, practices and challenges.
    de Bruin M
    Psychol Health; 2015 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25223823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions.
    Bonell C; Fletcher A; Morton M; Lorenc T; Moore L
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Dec; 75(12):2299-306. PubMed ID: 22989491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meeting the challenges of implementing process evaluation within randomized controlled trials: the example of ASSIST (A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial).
    Audrey S; Holliday J; Parry-Langdon N; Campbell R
    Health Educ Res; 2006 Jun; 21(3):366-77. PubMed ID: 16740670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using computer, mobile and wearable technology enhanced interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Stephenson A; McDonough SM; Murphy MH; Nugent CD; Mair JL
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2017 Aug; 14(1):105. PubMed ID: 28800736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Educational interventions to improve quality of life in people with chronic inflammatory skin diseases: systematic reviews of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
    Pickett K; Loveman E; Kalita N; Frampton GK; Jones J
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Oct; 19(86):1-176, v-vi. PubMed ID: 26502807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating complex public health interventions: theory, methods and scope of realist enquiry.
    Connelly JB
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Dec; 13(6):935-41. PubMed ID: 18070265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From question-behaviour effects in trials to the social psychology of research participation.
    McCambridge J
    Psychol Health; 2015 Jan; 30(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 25146179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health: a scoping review.
    Clar C; Dyakova M; Curtis K; Dawson C; Donnelly P; Knifton L; Clarke A
    Public Health; 2014 Dec; 128(12):1066-75. PubMed ID: 25443388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactive voice response interventions targeting behaviour change: a systematic literature review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Tsoli S; Sutton S; Kassavou A
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e018974. PubMed ID: 29478016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Epidemiological studies in evaluation of effectiveness of health promotion programmes].
    Szamotulska K
    Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2000; 4(4 Suppl 1):67-74. PubMed ID: 11490060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health.
    Wang S; Moss JR; Hiller JE
    Health Promot Int; 2006 Mar; 21(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 16249192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On randomized controlled trials and lifestyle interventions.
    Rosén M
    Int J Epidemiol; 1989 Dec; 18(4):993-4. PubMed ID: 2621039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In defense of the randomized controlled trial for health promotion research.
    Rosen L; Manor O; Engelhard D; Zucker D
    Am J Public Health; 2006 Jul; 96(7):1181-6. PubMed ID: 16735622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods don't make assumptions, researchers do: a response to Marchal et al.
    Bonell C; Fletcher A; Morton M; Lorenc T; Moore L
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Oct; 94():81-2. PubMed ID: 23931948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.