These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25140529)

  • 1. A quantitative linguistic analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 application critiques from investigators at one institution.
    Kaatz A; Magua W; Zimmerman DR; Carnes M
    Acad Med; 2015 Jan; 90(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 25140529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques.
    Magua W; Zhu X; Bhattacharya A; Filut A; Potvien A; Leatherberry R; Lee YG; Jens M; Malikireddy D; Carnes M; Kaatz A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 May; 26(5):560-570. PubMed ID: 28281870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?
    Kaatz A; Lee YG; Potvien A; Magua W; Filut A; Bhattacharya A; Leatherberry R; Zhu X; Carnes M
    Acad Med; 2016 Aug; 91(8):1080-8. PubMed ID: 27276003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward Independence: Resubmission Rate of Unfunded National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01 Research Grant Applications Among Early Stage Investigators.
    Boyington JE; Antman MD; Patel KC; Lauer MS
    Acad Med; 2016 Apr; 91(4):556-62. PubMed ID: 26650674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of Feedback on the Bridge to Independence: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of NIH Mentored Career Development Award Application Critiques.
    Kaatz A; Dattalo M; Regner C; Filut A; Carnes M
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 Jan; 25(1):78-90. PubMed ID: 26418619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications.
    Pier EL; Brauer M; Filut A; Kaatz A; Raclaw J; Nathan MJ; Ford CE; Carnes M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(12):2952-2957. PubMed ID: 29507248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort.
    Doyle JM; Baiocchi MT; Kiernan M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0257559. PubMed ID: 34793439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Criterion Scores Predict the Overall Impact Score and Funding Outcomes for National Institutes of Health Peer-Reviewed Applications.
    Eblen MK; Wagner RM; RoyChowdhury D; Patel KC; Pearson K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155060. PubMed ID: 27249058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
    Haggerty PA; Fenton MJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0199648. PubMed ID: 30208016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New physician-investigators receiving National Institutes of Health research project grants: a historical perspective on the "endangered species".
    Dickler HB; Fang D; Heinig SJ; Johnson E; Korn D
    JAMA; 2007 Jun; 297(22):2496-501. PubMed ID: 17565084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National Institutes of Health R01 Grant Funding Is Associated With Enhanced Research Productivity and Career Advancement Among Academic Cardiothoracic Surgeons.
    Bajaj SS; Wang H; Williams KM; Pickering JM; Heiler JC; Manjunatha K; O'Donnell CT; Sanchez M; Boyd JH
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021; 33(4):1047-1056. PubMed ID: 33359763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early career academic productivity among emergency physicians with R01 grant funding.
    Scott Van Epps J; Younger JG
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 18(7):759-62. PubMed ID: 21762237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of National Institutes of Health peer review of clinical grant applications.
    Kotchen TA; Lindquist T; Miller Sostek A; Hoffmann R; Malik K; Stanfield B
    J Investig Med; 2006 Jan; 54(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16409886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology: predictors of success in obtaining independent research funding.
    Okeigwe I; Wang C; Politch JA; Heffner LJ; Kuohung W
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):84.e1-84.e8. PubMed ID: 28315665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The unfunded grant, now what? Advice, approach, and strategy.
    Hunter CJ; Leiva T; Dudeja V
    Surgery; 2024 Feb; 175(2):317-322. PubMed ID: 37981550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding of Principal Investigators in Dermatology Research by Academic Degree and Sex.
    Cheng MY; Sukhov A; Sultani H; Kim K; Maverakis E
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Aug; 152(8):883-8. PubMed ID: 27191545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.
    Warner ET; Carapinha R; Weber GM; Hill EV; Reede JY
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Oct; 26(10):1086-1093. PubMed ID: 28771391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.
    Kotchen TA; Lindquist T; Malik K; Ehrenfeld E
    JAMA; 2004 Feb; 291(7):836-43. PubMed ID: 14970062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 Research Awards: Is There Evidence of a Double Bind for Women of Color?
    Ginther DK; Kahn S; Schaffer WT
    Acad Med; 2016 Aug; 91(8):1098-107. PubMed ID: 27306969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The pediatric surgeon's road to research independence: utility of mentor-based National Institutes of Health grants.
    King A; Sharma-Crawford I; Shaaban AF; Inge TH; Crombleholme TM; Warner BW; Lovvorn HN; Keswani SG
    J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23582227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.