These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25141016)

  • 1. Efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal in reducing cariogenic microbiota: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ammari MM; Moliterno LF; Hirata Júnior R; Séllos MC; Soviero VM; Coutinho Filho WP
    Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():. PubMed ID: 25141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) with that of conventional excavation in reducing the cariogenic flora.
    Azrak B; Callaway A; Grundheber A; Stender E; Willershausen B
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2004 May; 14(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 15139953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chemical, morphological and microhardness changes of dentine after chemomechanical caries removal.
    Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF; King NM
    Aust Dent J; 2013 Sep; 58(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 23981208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Viability of intratubular bacteria after chemomechanical caries removal.
    Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1972-6. PubMed ID: 25190603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie - a papain gel.
    Kumar J; Nayak M; Prasad KL; Gupta N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):697. PubMed ID: 23422631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.
    Gulzar S; Arora R; Shah AH; Bhardwaj B; Abusalim G; Khalil HS; Wyne AH
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 27965492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study.
    Viral PM; Nagarathna C; Shakuntala BS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 23855171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study.
    Corrêa FN; Rocha Rde O; Rodrigues Filho LE; Muench A; Rodrigues CR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2007; 31(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17550045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and microbiological evaluation of the carious dentin before and after application of Papacarie gel.
    Gupta S; Singh C; Yeluri R; Chaudhry K; Munshi AK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 38(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 24683776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and tolerance of papain gel with conventional drilling method: a clinico-microbiological study.
    Goyal PA; Kumari R; Kannan VP; Madhu S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 25823480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro.
    Flückiger L; Waltimo T; Stich H; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15683888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of residual dentine caries after conventional mechanical and chemomechanical caries removal with Carisolv.
    Splieth C; Rosin M; Gellissen B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Dec; 5(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 11800438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial.
    Lula EC; Monteiro-Neto V; Alves CM; Ribeiro CC
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 19648746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A chemomechanical method for caries removal.
    Morrow LA; Hassall DC; Watts DC; Wilson NH
    Dent Update; 2000 Oct; 27(8):398-401. PubMed ID: 11218535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo comparison of reduction in bacterial count after caries excavation with 3 different techniques.
    Zakirulla M; Uloopi KS; Subba Reddy VV
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2011; 78(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 22041006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass-ionomer liners after incomplete dentine caries removal.
    Duque C; Negrini Tde C; Sacono NT; Spolidorio DM; de Souza Costa CA; Hebling J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 19548010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro effectiveness of a chemo-mechanical method for caries removal.
    Peric T; Markovic D
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2007 Jun; 8(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 17571929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth: a SEM study.
    Avinash A; Grover SD; Koul M; Nayak MT; Singhvi A; Singh RK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 22918095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional caries removal and sealed caries in permanent teeth: a microbiological evaluation.
    Maltz M; Henz SL; de Oliveira EF; Jardim JJ
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):776-82. PubMed ID: 22664566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of Papacarie(®) in reduction of residual bacteria in deciduous teeth: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Motta LJ; Bussadori SK; Campanelli AP; Silva AL; Alfaya TA; Godoy CH; Navarro MF
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2014; 69(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 24838896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.