These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25141315)
1. The sensitivity of MR colonography using dark lumen technique for detection of colonic lesions. Acay MB; Bayramoğlu S; Acay A Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 25(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 25141315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening of colonic tumors by air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography. Lam WW; Leung WK; Wu JK; So NM; Sung JJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Apr; 19(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 15065168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection. Ajaj W; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Goyen M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1088-94. PubMed ID: 17031836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality. Saar B; Gschossmann JM; Bonel HM; Kickuth R; Vock P; Netzer P Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):580-6. PubMed ID: 18648258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance colonography: challenge for colonoscopy. Rockey DC Dig Dis; 2012; 30 Suppl 2():60-7. PubMed ID: 23207934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention? Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Goehde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 14745756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Air-inflated magnetic resonance colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy: Comparison with intraoperative findings, pathology specimens, and follow-up conventional colonoscopy. Wong TY; Lam WW; So NM; Lee JF; Leung KL Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 17100979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection. Geenen RW; Hussain SM; Cademartiri F; Poley JW; Siersema PD; Krestin GP Radiographics; 2004; 24(1):e18. PubMed ID: 14527992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Florie J; Jensch S; Nievelstein RA; Bartelsman JF; Baak LC; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; van Randen A; van der Ham MM; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 17329686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy. Cohnen M; Vogt C; Beck A; Andersen K; Heinen W; vom Dahl S; Aurich V; Haeussinger D; Moedder U AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Nov; 183(5):1355-9. PubMed ID: 15505303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]