209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25141315)
1. The sensitivity of MR colonography using dark lumen technique for detection of colonic lesions.
Acay MB; Bayramoğlu S; Acay A
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 25(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 25141315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening of colonic tumors by air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography.
Lam WW; Leung WK; Wu JK; So NM; Sung JJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Apr; 19(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 15065168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience.
Lauenstein TC; Herborn CU; Vogt FM; Göhde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
Rofo; 2001 Sep; 173(9):785-9. PubMed ID: 11582556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.
Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Adamek HE; Jakobs R; Pfeifer B; Eickhoff A; Zindel C; Riemann JF; Layer G
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 16304088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography.
Luboldt W; Bauerfeind P; Wildermuth S; Marincek B; Fried M; Debatin JF
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 10924558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Holtmann G; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Goehde SC
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 15591429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [MR-colonography in hospitalized patients: feasibility and sensitivity].
Kerker J; Albes G; Roer N; Montag M; Budde T; Schaefer A
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 18393151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dark lumen MR colonography: can high spatial resolution VIBE imaging improve the detection of colorectal masses?
Ajaj W; Rühm SG; Papanikolaou N; Lauenstein TC; Gerken G; Goyen M
Rofo; 2006 Nov; 178(11):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17128377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance colonography and virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy with the 1.0-T system: a feasibility study.
Saar B; Heverhagen JT; Obst T; Berthold LD; Kopp I; Klose KJ; Wagner HJ
Invest Radiol; 2000 Sep; 35(9):521-6. PubMed ID: 10981995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of colonic masses with MR colonography.
Haykir R; Karaköse S; Karabacakoğlu A; Kayaçetin E; Sahin M
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 17(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16941252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional vibe with two-dimensional FISP sequences: preliminary experience.
Lauenstein TC; Ajaj W; Kuehle CA; Goehde SC; Schlosser TW; Ruehm SG
Invest Radiol; 2005 Feb; 40(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15654253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection.
Ajaj W; Ruehm SG; Gerken G; Goyen M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Nov; 24(5):1088-94. PubMed ID: 17031836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of magnetic resonance colonography at 3.0 Tesla regarding diagnostic accuracy and image quality.
Saar B; Gschossmann JM; Bonel HM; Kickuth R; Vock P; Netzer P
Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):580-6. PubMed ID: 18648258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report.
Luboldt W; Steiner P; Bauerfeind P; Pelkonen P; Debatin JF
Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 9530299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance colonography: challenge for colonoscopy.
Rockey DC
Dig Dis; 2012; 30 Suppl 2():60-7. PubMed ID: 23207934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention?
Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Goehde SC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Feb; 19(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 14745756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Air-inflated magnetic resonance colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy: Comparison with intraoperative findings, pathology specimens, and follow-up conventional colonoscopy.
Wong TY; Lam WW; So NM; Lee JF; Leung KL
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 17100979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection.
Geenen RW; Hussain SM; Cademartiri F; Poley JW; Siersema PD; Krestin GP
Radiographics; 2004; 24(1):e18. PubMed ID: 14527992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer.
Florie J; Jensch S; Nievelstein RA; Bartelsman JF; Baak LC; van Gelder RE; Haberkorn B; van Randen A; van der Ham MM; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 17329686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy.
Cohnen M; Vogt C; Beck A; Andersen K; Heinen W; vom Dahl S; Aurich V; Haeussinger D; Moedder U
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Nov; 183(5):1355-9. PubMed ID: 15505303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
