These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25142025)

  • 21. Judgments of frequency and recency: how they relate to reports of subjective awareness.
    Hintzman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Nov; 27(6):1347-58. PubMed ID: 11713871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The difference between implicit and explicit associative processes at study in creating false memory in the DRM paradigm.
    Kawasaki Y; Yama H
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16423743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory.
    Dewhurst SA; Hitch GJ
    Memory; 1999 Mar; 7(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 10645376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Misinterpreting eyewitness expressions of confidence: The featural justification effect.
    Dodson CS; Dobolyi DG
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):266-80. PubMed ID: 25602181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recollective experience in odor recognition: influences of adult age and familiarity.
    Larsson M; Oberg C; Bäckman L
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jan; 70(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15480757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do changes in the subjective experience of recognition over time suggest independent processes?
    Tunney RJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):43-62. PubMed ID: 19341516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conscious control and memory awareness when recognising famous faces.
    Konstantinou I; Gardiner JM
    Memory; 2005 Jul; 13(5):449-57. PubMed ID: 16020375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conscious recollection and binding among context features.
    Boywitt CD; Meiser T
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):875-86. PubMed ID: 23792977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Processing fluency affects subjective claims of recollection.
    Kurilla BP; Westerman DL
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 18323065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model.
    Rotello CM; Macmillan NA; Reeder JA
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):588-616. PubMed ID: 15250777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of retention interval on the simultaneous cognate-noncognate and remember-know mirror effects.
    Algarabel S; Pitarque A; Gotor A
    Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 16423744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional cueing induces false memory.
    Miyoshi K; Ashida H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 Jul; 43():66-74. PubMed ID: 27253621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recollection in adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
    Souchay C; Wojcik DZ; Williams HL; Crathern S; Clarke P
    Cortex; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1598-609. PubMed ID: 23107379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Functional aspects of recollective experience in face recognition.
    Parkin AJ; Gardiner JM; Rosser R
    Conscious Cogn; 1995 Dec; 4(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 8750414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection.
    Yonelinas AP; Dobbins I; Szymanski MD; Dhaliwal HS; King L
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Dec; 5(4):418-41. PubMed ID: 9063609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition memory: a study of the effects of test format and aging.
    Bastin C; Van der Linden M
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Jan; 17(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 12597069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Binding of multidimensional context information as a distinctive characteristic of remember judgments.
    Meiser T; Sattler C; Weisser K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):32-49. PubMed ID: 18194053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The schema provokes a disparity of false recollection between actions and objects in an everyday scene.
    Yamada R; Itsukushima Y
    Scand J Psychol; 2013 Aug; 54(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 23672299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Revisiting the novelty effect: when familiarity, not novelty, enhances memory.
    Poppenk J; Köhler S; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1321-30. PubMed ID: 20804299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of the multimemory and detection theories of know and remember recognition judgments.
    Xu M; Bellezza FS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1197-210. PubMed ID: 11550748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.