199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25142622)
1. Analysis of treatment modalities and prognosis on microinvasive cervical cancer: a 10-year cohort study in China.
Qian Q; Yang J; Cao D; You Y; Chen J; Shen K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 25142622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.
Yoneda JY; Braganca JF; Sarian LO; Borba PP; Conceição JC; Zeferino LC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 25742569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conservative therapy in microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix is justified: an analysis of 59 cases and a review of the literature.
Baalbergen A; Smedts F; Helmerhorst TJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Dec; 21(9):1640-5. PubMed ID: 21897274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical outcome of patients with stage Ia1 and Ia2 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) study.
Gadducci A; Sartori E; Maggino T; Landoni F; Zola P; Cosio S; Pasinetti B; Alessi C; Maneo A; Ferrero A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):513-6. PubMed ID: 14658592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years.
Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conservative treatment of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix stage IA1: Defining conization height to an optimal oncological outcome.
Hartman CA; Bragança JF; Gurgel MSC; Zeferino LC; Andrade LALA; Teixeira JC
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253998. PubMed ID: 34283862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1).
He Y; Wu YM; Zhao Q; Wang T; Wang Y; Kong WM; Song F; Duan W; Zhu L; Zhang WY
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 24987910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical efficacy of conservative laser therapy for early-stage cervical cancer.
Yamaguchi H; Ueda M; Kanemura M; Izuma S; Nishiyama K; Tanaka Y; Noda S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(2):455-9. PubMed ID: 17316359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion for stage IA1 and IA2 cervical cancer.
Margolis B; Cagle-Colon K; Chen L; Tergas AI; Boyd L; Wright JD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jun; 30(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 32179697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment and outcome of stage Ia1 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Haller H; Krašević M; Mamula O; Brnčić-Fischer A; Eminović S; Manestar M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Apr; 113(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 21315348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a retrospective study and review of the literature.
Bisseling KC; Bekkers RL; Rome RM; Quinn MA
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 107(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 17707895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymph node metastasis and lymph vascular space invasion in microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Lee KB; Lee JM; Park CY; Lee KB; Cho HY; Ha SY
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(3):1184-7. PubMed ID: 16803504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of loop electrosurgical conization in the treatment of stage IA1 microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Bekkers RL; Keyser KG; Bulten J; Hanselaar AG; Schijf CP; Boonstra H; Massuger LF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2002; 12(5):485-9. PubMed ID: 12366667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conservative surgery for microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
Winter R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1998 Dec; 24(6):433-6. PubMed ID: 10063239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oncologic and obstetric outcomes after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ or stage IA1 cervical cancer.
Wang X; Bi Y; Wu H; Wu M; Li L
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19920. PubMed ID: 33199765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review.
Lucchini SM; Ferreyra HD; Landeros J; Esteban A; Donetch G; Goldsman MG; Borla HF; Heredia F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():163-168. PubMed ID: 34673464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery.
Bean LM; Ward KK; Plaxe SC; McHale MT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):332.e1-332.e6. PubMed ID: 28522318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
