153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25142810)
1. Effect of hospital volume on quality of care and outcome after rectal cancer surgery.
Leonard D; Penninckx F; Kartheuser A; Laenen A; Van Eycken E;
Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1475-82. PubMed ID: 25142810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome following laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Penninckx F; Kartheuser A; Van de Stadt J; Pattyn P; Mansvelt B; Bertrand C; Van Eycken E; Jegou D; Fieuws S;
Br J Surg; 2013 Sep; 100(10):1368-75. PubMed ID: 23939849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or stage III lower rectal cancer (JCOG0212): results from a multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial.
Fujita S; Akasu T; Mizusawa J; Saito N; Kinugasa Y; Kanemitsu Y; Ohue M; Fujii S; Shiozawa M; Yamaguchi T; Moriya Y;
Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jun; 13(6):616-21. PubMed ID: 22591948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of hospital volume on perioperative outcomes of rectal cancer.
Jonker FHW; Hagemans JAW; Verhoef C; Burger JWA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1894-1900. PubMed ID: 28822603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-related guideline adherence and outcome in low rectal cancer.
Schiphorst AH; Verweij NM; Pronk A; Hamaker ME
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Aug; 57(8):967-75. PubMed ID: 25003291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of abdominoperineal resection rate as a surrogate marker of hospital quality in rectal cancer surgery.
Jorgensen ML; Young JM; Dobbins TA; Solomon MJ
Br J Surg; 2013 Nov; 100(12):1655-63. PubMed ID: 24264791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands.
van Erning FN; van Steenbergen LN; van den Broek WT; Rutten HJ; Lemmens VE
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1199-206. PubMed ID: 24044806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recurrence and survival after mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Bülow S; Christensen IJ; Harling H; Kronborg O; Fenger C; Nielsen HJ; ;
Br J Surg; 2003 Aug; 90(8):974-80. PubMed ID: 12905551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Indicators of quality in surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma].
Junginger T; Kneist W; Sultanov F; Heintz A
Chirurg; 2003 May; 74(5):444-50; discussion 450-1. PubMed ID: 12748793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nationwide in-hospital mortality rate following rectal resection for rectal cancer according to annual hospital volume in Germany.
Diers J; Wagner J; Baum P; Lichthardt S; Kastner C; Matthes N; Matthes H; Germer CT; Löb S; Wiegering A
BJS Open; 2020 Apr; 4(2):310-319. PubMed ID: 32207577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability in the quality of rectal cancer care in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain): clinical audit as a basis for action.
Manchon-Walsh P; Borras JM; Espinas JA; Aliste L;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 21296543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery.
Spolverato G; Ejaz A; Hyder O; Kim Y; Pawlik TM
Br J Surg; 2014 Jun; 101(7):836-46. PubMed ID: 24760705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.
Kang SB; Park JW; Jeong SY; Nam BH; Choi HS; Kim DW; Lim SB; Lee TG; Kim DY; Kim JS; Chang HJ; Lee HS; Kim SY; Jung KH; Hong YS; Kim JH; Sohn DK; Kim DH; Oh JH
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Jul; 11(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 20610322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer Center Volume and Type Impact Stage-Specific Utilization of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer.
Midura EF; Jung AD; Daly MC; Hanseman DJ; Davis BR; Shah SA; Paquette IM
Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Aug; 62(8):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 28501970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.
Pugliese R; Di Lernia S; Sansonna F; Scandroglio I; Maggioni D; Ferrari GC; Costanzi A; Magistro C; De Carli S
Am J Surg; 2008 Feb; 195(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 18083137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital volume and outcome in rectal cancer patients; results of a population-based study in the Netherlands.
Hagemans JAW; Alberda WJ; Verstegen M; de Wilt JHW; Verhoef C; Elferink MA; Burger JWA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):613-619. PubMed ID: 30600101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term prognostic value of mesorectal grading after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.
Madbouly KM; Hussein AM; Abdelzaher E
Am J Surg; 2014 Sep; 208(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 24581995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.
Iversen LH
Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
