These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25143475)

  • 1. The role of prediction modeling in propensity score estimation: an evaluation of logistic regression, bCART, and the covariate-balancing propensity score.
    Wyss R; Ellis AR; Brookhart MA; Girman CJ; Jonsson Funk M; LoCasale R; Stürmer T
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 180(6):645-55. PubMed ID: 25143475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confounding control in a nonexperimental study of STAR*D data: logistic regression balanced covariates better than boosted CART.
    Ellis AR; Dusetzina SB; Hansen RA; Gaynes BN; Farley JF; Stürmer T
    Ann Epidemiol; 2013 Apr; 23(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 23419508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic score-based model averaging approach for propensity score estimation.
    Kabata D; Stuart EA; Shintani A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Oct; 24(1):228. PubMed ID: 39363252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving propensity score estimators' robustness to model misspecification using super learner.
    Pirracchio R; Petersen ML; van der Laan M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 181(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 25515168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the Utility of Coarsened Exact Matching for Pharmacoepidemiology Using Real and Simulated Claims Data.
    Ripollone JE; Huybrechts KF; Rothman KJ; Ferguson RE; Franklin JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 189(6):613-622. PubMed ID: 31845719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity score balance measures in pharmacoepidemiology: a simulation study.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Pestman WR; Belitser SV; Roes KC; Hoes AW; de Boer A; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Aug; 23(8):802-11. PubMed ID: 24478163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two propensity score-based methods for balancing covariates: the overlap weighting and fine stratification methods in real-world claims data.
    Wan W; Murugesan M; Nocon RS; Bolton J; Konetzka RT; Chin MH; Huang ES
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):122. PubMed ID: 38831393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the impact of propensity score estimation and implementation on covariate balance and confounding control within and across important subgroups in comparative effectiveness research.
    Girman CJ; Gokhale M; Kou TD; Brodovicz KG; Wyss R; Stürmer T
    Med Care; 2014 Mar; 52(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 24374422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Balance Super Learner: A robust adaptation of the Super Learner to improve estimation of the average treatment effect in the treated based on propensity score matching.
    Pirracchio R; Carone M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2504-2518. PubMed ID: 28339317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
    Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Balancing versus modelling in weighted analysis of non-randomised studies with survival outcomes: A simulation study.
    Filla T; Schwender H; Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2024 Jul; 43(17):3140-3163. PubMed ID: 38801062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Balance measures for propensity score methods: a clinical example on beta-agonist use and the risk of myocardial infarction.
    Groenwold RH; de Vries F; de Boer A; Pestman WR; Rutten FH; Hoes AW; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1130-7. PubMed ID: 21953948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity score analysis methods with balancing constraints: A Monte Carlo study.
    Li Y; Li L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):1119-1142. PubMed ID: 33525962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flexible propensity score estimation strategies for clustered data in observational studies.
    Chang TH; Nguyen TQ; Lee Y; Jackson JW; Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2022 Nov; 41(25):5016-5032. PubMed ID: 36263918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating uses of data mining techniques in propensity score estimation: a simulation study.
    Setoguchi S; Schneeweiss S; Brookhart MA; Glynn RJ; Cook EF
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jun; 17(6):546-55. PubMed ID: 18311848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Super Learner Prediction Modeling to Improve High-dimensional Propensity Score Estimation.
    Wyss R; Schneeweiss S; van der Laan M; Lendle SD; Ju C; Franklin JM
    Epidemiology; 2018 Jan; 29(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 28991001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weight trimming and propensity score weighting.
    Lee BK; Lessler J; Stuart EA
    PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e18174. PubMed ID: 21483818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using classification tree analysis to generate propensity score weights.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):703-712. PubMed ID: 28371206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of propensity score methods for causal inference with high-dimensional covariates.
    Gao Q; Zhang Y; Sun H; Wang T
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Jul; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 35667004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.