These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25143995)

  • 1. Guest editorial: Advances in control of multi-functional powered upper-limb prostheses.
    Nazarpour K; Cipriani C; Farina D; Kuiken T
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Jul; 22(4):711-5. PubMed ID: 25143995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recapitulating flesh with silicon and steel: advancements in upper extremity robotic prosthetics.
    Lee B; Attenello FJ; Liu CY; McLoughlin MP; Apuzzo ML
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(5-6):730-41. PubMed ID: 24631910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses.
    Parker P; Englehart K; Hudgins B
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Dec; 16(6):541-8. PubMed ID: 17045489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural machine interfaces for controlling multifunctional powered upper-limb prostheses.
    Ohnishi K; Weir RF; Kuiken TA
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2007 Jan; 4(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 17187470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Control of upper limb prostheses: terminology and proportional myoelectric control-a review.
    Fougner A; Stavdahl O; Kyberd PJ; Losier YG; Parker PA
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 Sep; 20(5):663-77. PubMed ID: 22665514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motor-commands decoding using peripheral nerve signals: a review.
    Hong KS; Aziz N; Ghafoor U
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Jun; 15(3):031004. PubMed ID: 29498358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Amputations--current developments].
    Greitemann B
    Orthopade; 2015 Jun; 44(6):407. PubMed ID: 25962862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Management of upper limb deformities. Treatment concepts through the years].
    Koller A; Wetz HH
    Orthopade; 2006 Nov; 35(11):1137-8, 1140-2, 1144-5. PubMed ID: 17061077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical motor areas and their properties: implications for neuroprosthetics.
    Cheney PD; Hill-Karrer J; Belhaj-Saïf A; McKiernan BJ; Park MC; Marcario JK
    Prog Brain Res; 2000; 128():135-60. PubMed ID: 11105675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses.
    Huang Y; Englehart KB; Hudgins B; Chan AD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1801-11. PubMed ID: 16285383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advances in upper extremity prosthetics.
    Zlotolow DA; Kozin SH
    Hand Clin; 2012 Nov; 28(4):587-93. PubMed ID: 23101609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Horizons in prosthesis development for the restoration of limb function.
    Aaron RK; Herr HM; Ciombor DM; Hochberg LR; Donoghue JP; Briant CL; Morgan JR; Ehrlich MG
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2006; 14(10 Spec No.):S198-204. PubMed ID: 17003199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MSMS software for VR simulations of neural prostheses and patient training and rehabilitation.
    Davoodi R; Loeb GE
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():156-62. PubMed ID: 21335781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applications of sensory feedback in motorized upper extremity prosthesis: a review.
    Schofield JS; Evans KR; Carey JP; Hebert JS
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2014 Sep; 11(5):499-511. PubMed ID: 24928327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motorized Biomechatronic Upper and Lower Limb Prostheses-Clinically Relevant Outcomes.
    Lechler K; Frossard B; Whelan L; Langlois D; Müller R; Kristjansson K
    PM R; 2018 Sep; 10(9 Suppl 2):S207-S219. PubMed ID: 30269806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Upper extremity myoelectric prosthetics.
    Uellendahl JE
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):639-52. PubMed ID: 10989484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement on upper limb body-powered prostheses (1921-2016): A systematic review.
    Hashim NA; Abd Razak NA; Abu Osman NA; Gholizadeh H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Jan; 232(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 29199518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review.
    Carey SL; Lura DJ; Highsmith MJ; ;
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 26230500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of body-powered upper limb prostheses by able-bodied subjects, using the Box and Blocks Test and the Nine-Hole Peg Test.
    Haverkate L; Smit G; Plettenburg DH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 25336050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technologies and combination therapies for enhancing movement training for people with a disability.
    Reinkensmeyer DJ; Boninger ML
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 9():17. PubMed ID: 22463132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.