318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25144220)
1. ICRP Publication 116--the first ICRP/ICRU application of the male and female adult reference computational phantoms.
Petoussi-Henss N; Bolch WE; Eckerman KF; Endo A; Hertel N; Hunt J; Menzel HG; Pelliccioni M; Schlattl H; Zankl M
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(18):5209-24. PubMed ID: 25144220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overview of the ICRP/ICRU adult reference computational phantoms and dose conversion coefficients for external idealised exposures.
Endo A; Petoussi-Henss N; Zankl M; Bolch WE; Eckerman KF; Hertel NE; Hunt JG; Pelliccioni M; Schlattl H; Menzel HG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Oct; 161(1-4):11-6. PubMed ID: 24285286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Organ and effective dose coefficients for cranial and caudal irradiation geometries: photons.
Veinot KG; Eckerman KF; Hertel NE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Feb; 168(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 25935016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ORGAN AND EFFECTIVE DOSE COEFFICIENTS FOR CRANIAL AND CAUDAL IRRADIATION GEOMETRIES: NEUTRONS.
Veinot KG; Eckerman KF; Hertel NE; Hiller MM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jun; 175(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 27574318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact on 141Ce, 144Ce, 95Zr, and 90Sr beta emitter dose coefficients of photon and electron SAFs calculated with ICRP/ICRU reference adult voxel computational phantoms.
Li WB; Zankl M; Schlattl H; Petoussi-Henss N; Eckerman KF; Bolch WE; Oeh U; Hoeschen C
Health Phys; 2010 Oct; 99(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 20838091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of the ICRP/ICRU reference computational phantoms to internal dosimetry: calculation of specific absorbed fractions of energy for photons and electrons.
Hadid L; Desbrée A; Schlattl H; Franck D; Blanchardon E; Zankl M
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(13):3631-41. PubMed ID: 20526035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective quality factors for neutrons based on the revised ICRP/ICRU recommendations.
Veinot KG; Hertel NE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16381781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between effective doses for voxel-based and stylized exposure models from photon and electron irradiation.
Kramer R; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5105-26. PubMed ID: 16237244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients for neutrons and protons calculated using the PHITS code and ICRP/ICRU adult reference computational phantoms.
Sato T; Endo A; Zankl M; Petoussi-Henss N; Niita K
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):1997-2014. PubMed ID: 19265210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the operational quantity for eye lens neutron dosimetry considering ICRU 95 report.
Djeffal S; Dubeau J; Sun J; Ali F
J Radiol Prot; 2022 Sep; 42(3):. PubMed ID: 36070675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conversion of ICRP male reference phantom to polygon-surface phantom.
Yeom YS; Han MC; Kim CH; Jeong JH
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6985-7007. PubMed ID: 24029733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PIECEWISE POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATIONS TO THE ICRP 116 EFFECTIVE DOSE COEFFICIENTS: PHOTONS AND NEUTRONS.
Mille MM; Hertel NE; Bergstrom PM; Lee C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Feb; 178(3):310-321. PubMed ID: 28981797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electron specific absorbed fractions for the adult male and female ICRP/ICRU reference computational phantoms.
Zankl M; Schlattl H; Petoussi-Henss N; Hoeschen C
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jul; 57(14):4501-26. PubMed ID: 22722546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. RPI-AM and RPI-AF, a pair of mesh-based, size-adjustable adult male and female computational phantoms using ICRP-89 parameters and their calculations for organ doses from monoenergetic photon beams.
Zhang J; Na YH; Caracappa PF; Xu XG
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(19):5885-908. PubMed ID: 19759412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Neutron Organ and Effective Dose Coefficients for PIMAL Stylized Phantoms in Bent Postures in Cranial and Caudal Irradiation Geometries.
Sivabhaskar S; Perry A; Dewji S
Health Phys; 2021 May; 120(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33470713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Synchrotron radiation shielding design and ICRP radiological protection quantities.
Bassey B; Moreno B; Chapman D
J Radiol Prot; 2015 Jun; 35(2):383-90. PubMed ID: 25906251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CALCULATION OF FLUENCE-TO-EFFECTIVE DOSE CONVERSION COEFFICIENTS FOR THE OPERATIONAL QUANTITY PROPOSED BY ICRU RC26.
Endo A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jul; 175(3):378-387. PubMed ID: 28028125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consideration of the ICRP 2006 revised tissue weighting factors on age-dependent values of the effective dose for external photons.
Lee C; Lee C; Han EY; Bolch WE
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17183127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Operational quantities and new approach by ICRU.
A. Endo on behalf of ICRU Report Committee 26 on Operational Radiation Protection Quantities for External Radiation
Ann ICRP; 2016 Jun; 45(1 Suppl):178-87. PubMed ID: 26980797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the implementation of the new radiation quantities recommended by ICRU/ICRP for practical use in interventional radiology: a Monte Carlo study.
Abdelrahman M; Lombardo P; Dabin J; Struelens L; Vanhavere F
J Radiol Prot; 2023 Feb; 43(1):. PubMed ID: 36720155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
