These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25144576)

  • 1. Corneal cell adhesion to contact lens hydrogel materials enhanced via tear film protein deposition.
    Elkins CM; Qi QM; Fuller GG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e105512. PubMed ID: 25144576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Composition of incubation solution impacts in vitro protein uptake to silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Jadi S; Heynen M; Luensmann D; Jones L
    Mol Vis; 2012; 18():337-47. PubMed ID: 22355245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corneal epithelial cell biocompatibility to silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lens packaging solutions.
    Gorbet MB; Tanti NC; Jones L; Sheardown H
    Mol Vis; 2010 Feb; 16():272-82. PubMed ID: 20169012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of eye closure on protein and complement deposition on Group IV hydrogel contact lenses: relationship to tear flow dynamics.
    Sack RA; Sathe S; Hackworth LA; Willcox MD; Holden BA; Morris CA
    Curr Eye Res; 1996 Nov; 15(11):1092-100. PubMed ID: 8950503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biological and Clinical Implications of Lysozyme Deposition on Soft Contact Lenses.
    Omali NB; Subbaraman LN; Coles-Brennan C; Fadli Z; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):750-7. PubMed ID: 26002002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficiency of contact lens care regimens on protein removal from hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Luensmann D; Heynen M; Liu L; Sheardown H; Jones L
    Mol Vis; 2010 Jan; 16():79-92. PubMed ID: 20098668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components.
    Cheng L; Muller SJ; Radke CJ
    Curr Eye Res; 2004 Feb; 28(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 14972715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In Vitro Effect of Lysozyme on Albumin Deposition to Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials.
    Babaei Omali N; Subbaraman LN; Heynen M; Fadli Z; Coles-Brennan C; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Nov; 94(11):1047-1051. PubMed ID: 29040199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time.
    Carney FP; Nash WL; Sentell KB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18172083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contact lens physical properties and lipid deposition in a novel characterized artificial tear solution.
    Lorentz H; Heynen M; Kay LM; Dominici CY; Khan W; Ng WW; Jones L
    Mol Vis; 2011; 17():3392-405. PubMed ID: 22219635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of tear film components on the conformational state of lysozyme deposited on contact lenses.
    Ng A; Heynen M; Luensmann D; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2013 Oct; 101(7):1172-81. PubMed ID: 23564739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adhesion and growth of Serratia marcescens on artificial closed eye tears soaked hydrogel contact lenses.
    Hume EB; Willcox MD
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1997 May; 25 Suppl 1():S39-41. PubMed ID: 9267622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of silicone hydrogel lenses and solutions on corneal epithelial permeability.
    Duench S; Sorbara L; Keir N; Simpson T; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 90(6):546-56. PubMed ID: 23645374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tear film surface quality with soft contact lenses using dynamic-area high-speed videokeratoscopy.
    Alonso-Caneiro D; Iskander DR; Collins MJ
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 19657279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison by contact lens cytology and clinical tests of three contact lens types.
    Wilson G; Schwallie JD; Bauman RE
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 May; 75(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 9624696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of lysosomal deposition on the friction coefficient of hydrogel contact lenses.
    Su CY; Yeh LK; Lai CC; Li KY; Tseng CL; Fang HW
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Apr; 43(2):144-148. PubMed ID: 31623924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the Tear Function Tests and the Ocular Surface in First-Time Users of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
    Yildiz Tasci Y; Gürdal C; Sarac O; Onusever A
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Jul; 42(7):976-981. PubMed ID: 28306352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multipurpose care solution-induced corneal surface disruption and Pseudomonas aeruginosa internalization in the rabbit corneal epithelium.
    Posch LC; Zhu M; Robertson DM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(7):4229-37. PubMed ID: 24876286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of tear film components on lysozyme deposition to contact lenses.
    Ng A; Heynen M; Luensmann D; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 89(4):392-400. PubMed ID: 22388670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contact lenses as a drug delivery device for epidermal growth factor in the treatment of ocular wounds.
    Schultz CL; Morck DW
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 20406255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.