These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25145642)

  • 1. Effect of depth of general anesthesia on the threshold of electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implantation.
    Eftekharian A; Amizadeh M; Mottaghi K; Safari F; Mahani MH; Ranjbar LA; Abdi A; Mokari N
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 272(10):2697-701. PubMed ID: 25145642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of total intravenous vs volatile anesthetics on intraoperatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potential in children undergoing cochlear implant surgery: A randomized prospective study.
    Alhowary AA; El-Radaideh K; Al-Rusan A; Hani DB; Khraise W; Al Omari A; Alzoubi F
    J Clin Anesth; 2017 Feb; 36():80-83. PubMed ID: 28183580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of electrically evoked compound action potential of the auditory nerve in children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Caldas FF; Cardoso CC; Barreto MA; Teixeira MS; Hilgenberg AM; Serra LS; Bahmad Junior F
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 26727607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of congenital inner ear malformations (IEMs) on electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) responses in cochlear implant children.
    Said NM; Telmesani LS; Telmesani LM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Dec; 280(12):5193-5204. PubMed ID: 37606729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T; Naito Y; Hirai T; Yamaguchi S; Ito J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wang Y; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
    Chao X; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H; Fan Z; Xu L
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4309. PubMed ID: 36922582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; van Zanten GA
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 17062500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Plasticity after pediatric cochlear implantation: Implication from changes in peripheral plasma level of BDNF and auditory nerve responses.
    Alemi R; Motassadi Zarandy M; Joghataei MT; Eftekharian A; Zarrindast MR; Vousooghi N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 105():103-110. PubMed ID: 29447794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etlert CP; O'Brient S; Oleson JJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 20085195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between Preoperative Auditory Steady-State Response and Postoperative Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response and T Level in Cochlear Implantation for Child Patients with Inner-Ear Malformations.
    Qiao XF; Li X; Wang D; Li TL
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2018; 80(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 29672320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrically evoked compound action potential measures for virtual channels versus physical electrodes.
    Hughes ML; Goulson AM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 21187752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.