576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25146024)
1. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study.
Cruz A; Vera J; Gascón G; Palafox-Sánchez CA; Amezcua O; Mercado G
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 25146024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Light and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of Glyde File Prep in smear layer removal.
Lim TS; Wee TY; Choi MY; Koh WC; Sae-Lim V
Int Endod J; 2003 May; 36(5):336-43. PubMed ID: 12752647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Glyde File Prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant.
Grandini S; Balleri P; Ferrari M
J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 12043868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of smear layer removal protocols in curved root canals.
Yeung W; Raldi DP; Cunha RS; Mello I
Aust Endod J; 2014 Aug; 40(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 25244220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris.
Curtis TO; Sedgley CM
J Endod; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1261-4. PubMed ID: 22892747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Kamel WH; Kataia EM
J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ex vivo evaluation of various instrumentation techniques and irrigants in reducing E. faecalis within root canals.
Basmaci F; Oztan MD; Kiyan M
Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):823-30. PubMed ID: 23441862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.
Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ability of chemomechanical preparation with either rotary instruments or self-adjusting file to disinfect oval-shaped root canals.
Siqueira JF; Alves FR; Almeida BM; de Oliveira JC; Rôças IN
J Endod; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1860-5. PubMed ID: 20951301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.
Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of biofilm removal with hand, rotary nickel-titanium, and self-adjusting file instrumentation using a novel in vitro biofilm model.
Lin J; Shen Y; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2013 May; 39(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 23611386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study.
Vera J; Siqueira JF; Ricucci D; Loghin S; Fernández N; Flores B; Cruz AG
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1040-52. PubMed ID: 22794203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
