These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25147021)

  • 21. Large-scale modeling of reactive solute transport in fracture zones of granitic bedrocks.
    Molinero J; Samper J
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(3-4):293-318. PubMed ID: 16337025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A biosphere modeling methodology for dose assessments of the potential Yucca Mountain deep geological high level radioactive waste repository.
    Watkins BM; Smith GM; Little RH; Kessler J
    Health Phys; 1999 Apr; 76(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 10086596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Parametric analyses of diffusion of activated sources in disposal forms.
    Majorana CE; Salomoni VA
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Sep; 113(1-3):45-56. PubMed ID: 15363513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A modelling approach to assess the environmental/radiological impact of C-14 release from radioactive waste repositories.
    Doulgeris C; Humphreys P
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Sep; 205-206():61-71. PubMed ID: 31102907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Understanding complex LNAPL sites: Illustrated handbook of LNAPL transport and fate in the subsurface.
    Tomlinson DW; Rivett MO; Wealthall GP; Sweeney REH
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 204(Pt 2):748-756. PubMed ID: 28935398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Real-time gamma imaging of technetium transport through natural and engineered porous materials for radioactive waste disposal.
    Corkhill CL; Bridge JW; Chen XC; Hillel P; Thornton SF; Romero-Gonzalez ME; Banwart SA; Hyatt NC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Dec; 47(23):13857-64. PubMed ID: 24147650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radioactive waste management in France: safety demonstration fundamentals.
    Ouzounian G; Voinis S; Boissier F
    Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):286-93. PubMed ID: 23089028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modelling of calcium leaching and its influence on radionuclide migration across the concrete engineered barrier in a NSDF.
    Adinarayana KN; Sasidhar P; Balasubramaniyan V
    J Environ Radioact; 2013 Oct; 124():93-100. PubMed ID: 23685701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characterisation and modelling of mixing processes in groundwaters of a potential geological repository for nuclear wastes in crystalline rocks of Sweden.
    Gómez JB; Gimeno MJ; Auqué LF; Acero P
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 468-469():791-803. PubMed ID: 24070873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tectonic and climatic considerations for deep geological disposal of radioactive waste: A UK perspective.
    McEvoy FM; Schofield DI; Shaw RP; Norris S
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 571():507-21. PubMed ID: 27457674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-term geochemical evolution of the near field repository: insights from reactive transport modelling and experimental evidences.
    Arcos D; Grandia F; Domènech C; Fernández AM; Villar MV; Muurinen A; Carlsson T; Sellin P; Hernán P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Dec; 102(3-4):196-209. PubMed ID: 18992963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 'Geo'chemical research: a key building block for nuclear waste disposal safety cases.
    Altmann S
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Dec; 102(3-4):174-9. PubMed ID: 19008019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Siting Deep Boreholes for Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Consequences for Tight Coupling between Natural and Engineered Systems.
    Krall L; McCartin T; Macfarlane A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 54(2):629-646. PubMed ID: 31904229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analytical solutions for reactive transport of N-member radionuclide chains in a single fracture.
    Sun Y; Buscheck TA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003; 62-63():695-712. PubMed ID: 12714317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impacts on non-human biota from a generic geological disposal facility for radioactive waste: some key assessment issues.
    Robinson CA; Smith KL; Norris S
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 20530857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The establishment of a radioactive waste disposal facility in Western Australia for low level waste.
    Hartley BM; Wall B; Munslow-Davies L; Toussaint LF; Hirschberg KJ; Terry KW; Shepherd M
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1998 Mar; 49(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 9451779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. INDIVIDUAL DOSIMETRY IN DISPOSAL REPOSITORY OF HEAT-GENERATING NUCLEAR WASTE.
    Pang B; Saurí Suárez H; Becker F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):387-92. PubMed ID: 27150513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of the multiscale thermohydrologic model used for analysis of a proposed repository at Yucca Mountain.
    Buscheck TA; Glascoe LG; Lee KH; Gansemer J; Sun Y; Mansoor K
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003; 62-63():421-40. PubMed ID: 12714303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contribution to a more realistic approach in assessing the release of C-14 from low-level radioactive waste repositories.
    Bracke G; Müller W
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Dec; 102(3-4):210-6. PubMed ID: 19022527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Post-closure biosphere assessment modelling: comparison of complex and more stylised approaches.
    Walke RC; Kirchner G; Xu S; Dverstorp B
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Oct; 148():50-8. PubMed ID: 26111499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.