These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Radiographic and histological evaluation of deproteinized bovine bone mineral vs. deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in ridge preservation. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Nart J; Barallat L; Jimenez D; Mestres J; Gómez A; Carrasco MA; Violant D; Ruíz-Magaz V Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):840-848. PubMed ID: 27335267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bio-Oss(®) for delayed osseointegration of implants in dogs: a histological study. Liu HY; Zheng H; Hou XP; Zhong WJ; Ying XX; Chai SL; Ma GW Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 52(8):729-34. PubMed ID: 25060973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deproteinized bovine bone and biodegradable barrier membranes to support healing following immediate placement of transmucosal implants: a short-term controlled clinical trial. Cornelini R; Cangini F; Martuscelli G; Wennström J Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Dec; 24(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 15626318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Tawil G; Mawla M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results. Barone A; Orlando B; Cingano L; Marconcini S; Derchi G; Covani U J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):836-46. PubMed ID: 22141358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preservation and augmentation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis: A prospective clinical trial. Zhao L; Xu T; Hu W; Chung KH Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):333-344. PubMed ID: 29377475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiographic comparison of atelocollagen versus deproteinized bovine bone minerals covered with a collagen membrane in alveolar ridge preservation: a retrospective study. You S; Yu F; Fan Q; Xia T; Liang L; Yan Q; Zeng H; Shi B BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):901. PubMed ID: 37990178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alveolar ridge preservation using resorbable bioactive ceramic composite: a histological study. Al-Sabbagh M; Burt J; Barakat A; Kutkut A; El-Ghannam A J Int Acad Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 15(3):91-8. PubMed ID: 24079101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-Dimensional Volumetric Changes in Severely Resorbed Alveolar Sockets After Ridge Augmentation with Bovine-Derived Xenograft and Resorbable Barrier: A Preliminary Study on CBCT Imaging. Manavella V; Romano F; Corano L; Bignardi C; Aimetti M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):373–382. PubMed ID: 28817739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning. Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographic alveolar bone changes following ridge preservation with two different biomaterials. Mardas N; D'Aiuto F; Mezzomo L; Arzoumanidi M; Donos N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 21561483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Dental implantation and soft tissue augmentation after ridge preservation in a molar site: a case report]. Zhao LP; Zhan YL; Hu WJ; Wang HJ; Wei YP; Zhen M; Xu T; Liu YS Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Dec; 48(6):1090-1094. PubMed ID: 27987520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tissue changes of extraction sockets in humans: a comparison of spontaneous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing. Barone A; Ricci M; Tonelli P; Santini S; Covani U Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1231-7. PubMed ID: 22784417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preservation of the ridge and sealing of the socket with a combination epithelialised and subepithelial connective tissue graft for management of defects in the buccal bone before insertion of implants: a case series. Stimmelmayr M; Güth JF; Iglhaut G; Beuer F Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 50(6):550-5. PubMed ID: 22000635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using rhBMP-2: an experimental study in canine. Lee JS; Jung JS; Im GI; Kim BS; Cho KS; Kim CS J Clin Periodontol; 2015 Jul; 42(7):678-87. PubMed ID: 25946650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio Oss). Simion M; Fontana F; Rasperini G; Maiorana C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):620-9. PubMed ID: 17877463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dimensional Evaluation of Different Ridge Preservation Techniques with a Bovine Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Fischer KR; Mühlemann S; Jung RE; Friedmann A; Fickl S Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(4):549-556. PubMed ID: 29889920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postextraction socket preservation using epithelial connective tissue graft vs porcine collagen matrix. 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Meloni SM; Tallarico M; Lolli FM; Deledda A; Pisano M; Jovanovic SA Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 25738178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]