These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25148783)

  • 1. Family forest landowners' interest in forest carbon offset programs: focus group findings from the lake States, USA.
    Miller KA; Snyder SA; Kilgore MA; Davenport MA
    Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 54(6):1399-411. PubMed ID: 25148783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.
    Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Small-scale forestry and carbon offset markets: An empirical study of Vermont Current Use forest landowner willingness to accept carbon credit programs.
    White AE; Lutz DA; Howarth RB; Soto JR
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201967. PubMed ID: 30106977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anticipating changes in wildlife habitat induced by private forest owners' adaptation to climate change and carbon policy.
    Hashida Y; Withey J; Lewis DJ; Newman T; Kline JD
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230525. PubMed ID: 32240191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
    Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Personal networks and private forestry in Minnesota.
    Sagor ES; Becker DR
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():145-54. PubMed ID: 24295725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Larkin JL
    Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 30535797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
    Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The lay of the land: What we know about non-operating agricultural and absentee forest landowners in the U.S. and Europe.
    Fairchild E; Ulrich-Schad JD; Petrzelka P; Ma Z
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 313():114991. PubMed ID: 35367676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-boundary coordination on forested landscapes: investigating alternatives for implementation.
    Gass RJ; Rickenbach M; Schulte LA; Zeuli K
    Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 43(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 18777190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States.
    McKinley DC; Ryan MG; Birdsey RA; Giardina CP; Harmon ME; Heath LS; Houghton RA; Jackson RB; Morrison JF; Murray BC; Patakl DE; Skog KE
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1902-24. PubMed ID: 21939033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Carrots and sticks: New Brunswick and Maine forest landowner perceptions toward incentives and regulations.
    Quartuch MR; Beckley TM
    Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 53(1):202-18. PubMed ID: 24281917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of preference heterogeneity among landowners on spatial conservation prioritization.
    Nielsen ASE; Strange N; Bruun HH; Jacobsen JB
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 27995662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships.
    Stroman DA; Kreuter UP
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():284-291. PubMed ID: 25190596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting private forest landowner interest in ecosystem management: linking spatial and survey data.
    Jacobson MG
    Environ Manage; 2002 Oct; 30(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 12481923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation.
    Sorice MG; Oh CO; Gartner T; Snieckus M; Johnson R; Donlan CJ
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1146-55. PubMed ID: 23967582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding perceptions of stakeholder groups about Forestry Best Management Practices in Georgia.
    Tumpach C; Dwivedi P; Izlar R; Cook C
    J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 213():374-381. PubMed ID: 29502022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors Influencing Family Forest Owners' Interest in Community-led Collective Invasive Plant Management.
    Clarke M; Ma Z; Snyder SA; Floress K
    Environ Manage; 2021 Jun; 67(6):1088-1099. PubMed ID: 33818641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An empirical evaluation of private landowner participation in voluntary forest conservation programs.
    Kauneckis D; York AM
    Environ Manage; 2009 Sep; 44(3):468-84. PubMed ID: 19629580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.