BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25150274)

  • 1. Comparison of the mandibular hinge axis in adult patients with facial asymmetry with and without posterior unilateral crossbite.
    Takada J; Miyamoto JJ; Yokota T; Ono T; Moriyama K
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25150274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transverse skeletal and dental asymmetry in adults with unilateral lingual posterior crossbite.
    Langberg BJ; Arai K; Miner RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):6-15; discussion 15-6. PubMed ID: 15643408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in adults with unilateral posterior crossbite.
    O'Byrn BL; Sadowsky C; Schneider B; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Apr; 107(4):394-400. PubMed ID: 7709904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphological and positional asymmetries of young children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite.
    Pinto AS; Buschang PH; Throckmorton GS; Chen P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Nov; 120(5):513-20. PubMed ID: 11709670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Morphologic, functional, and occlusal characterization of mandibular lateral displacement malocclusion.
    Ishizaki K; Suzuki K; Mito T; Tanaka EM; Sato S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):454.e1-9; discussion 454-5. PubMed ID: 20362898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tooth axis and skeletal structures in mandibular molar vertical sections in jaw deformity with facial asymmetry using MPR images.
    Nojima K; Yokose T; Ishii T; Kobayashi M; Nishii Y
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2007 Nov; 48(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 18360103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between intraoral pressure and molar position and inclination in subjects with facial asymmetry.
    Takada J; Ono T; Miyamoto JJ; Yokota T; Moriyama K
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 20829312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite patients and a normal occlusion sample.
    Uysal T; Sisman Y; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 19577146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between unilateral posterior crossbite and mandibular asymmetry during late adolescence.
    Lopatienė K; Trumpytė K
    Stomatologija; 2018; 20(3):90-95. PubMed ID: 30531163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 11298314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular asymmetry and condylar position in children with unilateral posterior crossbite.
    Lam PH; Sadowsky C; Omerza F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 May; 115(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 10229892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular asymmetry in young adult patients with unilateral posterior crossbite: A controlled retrospective CBCT study.
    Miresmaeili A; Salehisaheb H; Farhadian M; Borjali M
    Int Orthod; 2021 Sep; 19(3):433-444. PubMed ID: 34088620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandibular asymmetry in unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite patients using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Veli I; Uysal T; Ozer T; Ucar FI; Eruz M
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Nov; 81(6):966-74. PubMed ID: 21591969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The three-dimensional morphology of mandible and glenoid fossa as contributing factors to menton deviation in facial asymmetry-retrospective study.
    Oh MH; Cho JH
    Prog Orthod; 2020 Sep; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 32959138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of unilateral posterior crossbite and unilateral cleft lip and palate on vertical mandibular asymmetry.
    Abad-Santamaría L; López-de-Andrés A; Jiménez-Trujillo I; Ruíz C; Romero M
    Ir J Med Sci; 2014 Sep; 183(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 24097050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transverse maxillary arch form and mandibular asymmetry in patients with posterior unilateral crossbite.
    Ferro F; Spinella P; Lama N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):828-38. PubMed ID: 22133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Condylar asymmetry in unilateral posterior crossbite patients.
    Kilic N; Kiki A; Oktay H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):382-7. PubMed ID: 18331937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A computer-based assessment of structural and displacement asymmetries of the mandible.
    Schmid W; Mongini F; Felisio A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Jul; 100(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 2069142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between mandibular asymmetry and occlusal asymmetry in young adult males with class III malocclusion.
    Staudt CB; Kiliaridis S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 May; 68(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 20085500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Features in subjects with the frontal occlusal plane inclined toward the contralateral side of the mandibular deviation.
    Uesugi S; Yonemitsu I; Kokai S; Takei M; Omura S; Ono T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 26718377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.