These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25151185)

  • 21. How to improve patient care by learning from mistakes.
    Brady M
    Emerg Nurse; 2013 Feb; 20(9):32-5. PubMed ID: 23516729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.
    Morris JA; Carrillo Y; Jenkins JM; Smith PW; Bledsoe S; Pichert J; White A
    Ann Surg; 2003 Jun; 237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. PubMed ID: 12796581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Peer review-can we detect risk factors and errors to improve the quality of patient care?].
    Steiner T
    Urologe A; 2018 Jul; 57(7):785-789. PubMed ID: 29796698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving quality of patient care by improving daily practice in radiation oncology.
    Chera BS; Jackson M; Mazur LM; Adams R; Chang S; Deschesne K; Cullip T; Marks LB
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 22177881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical supervisors: are they the key to making care safer?
    Walton M; Barraclough B
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Aug; 22(8):609-12. PubMed ID: 23708644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving disclosure and management of medical error - an opportunity to transform the surgeons of tomorrow.
    Tevlin R; Doherty E; Traynor O
    Surgeon; 2013 Dec; 11(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 24041832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What have we learned about interventions to reduce medical errors?
    Woodward HI; Mytton OT; Lemer C; Yardley IE; Ellis BM; Rutter PD; Greaves FE; Noble DJ; Kelley E; Wu AW
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2010; 31():479-97 1 p following 497. PubMed ID: 20070203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The safety and quality of decision support systems.
    Coiera E; Westbrook J; Wyatt J
    Yearb Med Inform; 2006; ():20-5. PubMed ID: 17051290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The objective impact of clinical peer review on hospital quality and safety.
    Edwards MT
    Am J Med Qual; 2011; 26(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 21169223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peer case review sharpens event analysis.
    Hitchings KS; Davies-Hathen N; Capuano TA; Morgan G; Bendekovits R
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2008; 23(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 18528303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What about doctors? The impact of medical errors.
    Abd Elwahab S; Doherty E
    Surgeon; 2014 Dec; 12(6):297-300. PubMed ID: 25056239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contextual errors and failures in individualizing patient care: a multicenter study.
    Weiner SJ; Schwartz A; Weaver F; Goldberg J; Yudkowsky R; Sharma G; Binns-Calvey A; Preyss B; Schapira MM; Persell SD; Jacobs E; Abrams RI
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Jul; 153(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 20643988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Continuing education meets the learning organization: the challenge of a systems approach to patient safety.
    Eisenberg JM
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2000; 20(4):197-207. PubMed ID: 11201059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving Patient Safety: Improving Communication.
    Bittner-Fagan H; Davis J; Savoy M
    FP Essent; 2017 Dec; 463():27-33. PubMed ID: 29210557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Organizational Response to Known Medical Errors: Does Peer Review Protection Impede Improvement?
    Wenner WJ; Choi SW
    Am J Med Qual; 2018; 33(5):552-553. PubMed ID: 29665700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Thinking ethically about medical mistakes.
    Smith ML
    J Child Neurol; 2013 Jun; 28(6):809-11. PubMed ID: 23435283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Assurance of process-quality in pulmonary practice by means of a peer-review system--a pilot project].
    Fischer J; Köhler D; Magnussen H
    Pneumologie; 2006 Aug; 60(8):485-92. PubMed ID: 16933192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lessons Learned from Peer Learning Conference in Cardiothoracic Radiology.
    Sayyouh MMH; Sella EC; Shankar PR; Marshall GE; Quint LE; Agarwal PP
    Radiographics; 2022; 42(2):579-593. PubMed ID: 35148241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Leadership, safety climate, and continuous quality improvement: impact on process quality and patient safety.
    McFadden KL; Stock GN; Gowen CR
    J Nurs Adm; 2014 Oct; 44(10 Suppl):S27-37. PubMed ID: 25279509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medical errors in surgery.
    Emmott D
    Bioethics Forum; 2001; 17(2):26-31. PubMed ID: 12166431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.