These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25151294)
1. Outcomes of solid palpable masses assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4A: a retrospective review. Patterson SK; Neal CH; Jeffries DO; Joe A; Klein K; Bailey J; Pinsky R; Paramagul C; Watcharotone K Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 25151294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management. Giess CS; Smeglin LZ; Meyer JE; Ritner JA; Birdwell RL J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1943-9. PubMed ID: 23197547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses. Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management--follow-up and outcome. Raza S; Chikarmane SA; Neilsen SS; Zorn LM; Birdwell RL Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):773-81. PubMed ID: 18647850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions. Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification in 51 excised palpable pediatric breast masses. Koning JL; Davenport KP; Poole PS; Kruk PG; Grabowski JE J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Oct; 50(10):1746-50. PubMed ID: 25783351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shear-wave elastography and greyscale assessment of palpable probably benign masses: is biopsy always required? Giannotti E; Vinnicombe S; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie C; Jordan L; Evans A Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150865. PubMed ID: 27007593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Ultrasound follow-up of palpable solid, probably benign breast lesions (BI-RADS category III)]. Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjäger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R Rofo; 2004 Sep; 176(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 15346259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions? Tozaki M; Fukuma E Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation. Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS. Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Palpable breast abnormalities in women under age 40. Lee MV; Shaw HL; Chi T; Brazeal HA; Holley SO; Appleton CM Breast J; 2018 Sep; 24(5):798-805. PubMed ID: 29687544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5. Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability? Shin JH; Han BK; Ko EY; Choe YH; Nam SJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):W187-91. PubMed ID: 19304679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Downgrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study. Neuschler EI; Lavin PT; Tucker FL; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Dogan BE; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Young CA; Butler R AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):689-700. PubMed ID: 29975115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter. Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts. Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C; Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]