282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25151590)
1. Assessment of the effective dose in supine, prone, and oblique positions in the maxillofacial region using a novel combined extremity and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography scanner.
Koivisto J; Wolff J; Järnstedt J; Dastidar P; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Sep; 118(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25151590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effective Radiation Dose in the Wrist Resulting from a Radiographic Device, Two CBCT Devices and One MSCT Device: A Comparative Study.
Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Apr; 179(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 29040707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Tapiovaara M; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 22862982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of prone, supine and oblique patient positioning on CBCT image quality, contrast-to-noise ratio and figure of merit value in the maxillofacial region.
Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Järnstedt J; Holli-Helenius K; Dastidar P; Wolff J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20160418. PubMed ID: 28306334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effective radiation dose of a MSCT, two CBCT and one conventional radiography device in the ankle region.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Kadesjö N; Shi XQ; Wolff J
J Foot Ankle Res; 2015; 8():8. PubMed ID: 25788986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region.
Koivisto J; van Eijnatten M; Ludlow J; Kiljunen T; Shi XQ; Wolff J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):128-138. PubMed ID: 33811787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dosimetry of cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scanning for temporal bone].
Xie XY; Zhang ZY; Wang Z; Yin GX; Jia SM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 98(23):1837-1840. PubMed ID: 29925165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters.
Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 23825221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Thyroid shields for radiation dose reduction during cone beam computed tomography scanning for different oral and maxillofacial regions.
Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e376-80. PubMed ID: 22209523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging.
De Cock J; Zanca F; Canning J; Pauwels R; Hermans R
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jul; 25(7):1891-900. PubMed ID: 25773935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using Monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms.
Morant JJ; Salvadó M; Hernández-Girón I; Casanovas R; Ortega R; Calzado A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):92555893. PubMed ID: 22933532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications.
Loubele M; Bogaerts R; Van Dijck E; Pauwels R; Vanheusden S; Suetens P; Marchal G; Sanderink G; Jacobs R
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):461-8. PubMed ID: 18639404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology].
Qu XM; Li G; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 46(10):595-9. PubMed ID: 22321628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.
Pauwels R; Beinsberger J; Collaert B; Theodorakou C; Rogers J; Walker A; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 21196094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effective doses from cone beam CT investigation of the jaws.
Davies J; Johnson B; Drage N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 22184626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hand-wrist, knee, and foot-ankle dosimetry and image quality measurements of a novel extremity imaging unit providing CBCT and 2D imaging options.
Ludlow JB
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4955-4963. PubMed ID: 30229941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
