110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25152901)
1. Generalized models for rock joint surface shapes.
Du S; Hu Y; Hu X
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():171873. PubMed ID: 25152901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of rock joint surface anisotropy considering the contribution ratios of undulations in different directions.
Huang M; Hong C; Ma C; Luo Z; Du S
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17117. PubMed ID: 33051574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative characterization of solute transport in fractures with different surface roughness based on ten Barton profiles.
Hu Y; Xu W; Zhan L; Li J; Chen Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Apr; 27(12):13534-13549. PubMed ID: 32026373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unveiling the mystery of scale dependence of surface roughness of natural rock joints.
Li Y; Yang H; Sun S
Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):1013. PubMed ID: 35046450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of particle shape on mechanical behaviors of rocks: a numerical study using clumped particle model.
Rong G; Liu G; Hou D; Zhou CB
ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():589215. PubMed ID: 23997677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generalized law of friction between elastomers and differently shaped rough bodies.
Popov VL; Voll L; Li Q; Chai YS; Popov M
Sci Rep; 2014 Jan; 4():3750. PubMed ID: 24435002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Theoretical model for the wetting of a rough surface.
Hay KM; Dragila MI; Liburdy J
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2008 Sep; 325(2):472-7. PubMed ID: 18586259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Theoretical and numerical investigations on shapes of planar lipid monolayer domains.
Wu H; Tu ZC
J Chem Phys; 2009 Jan; 130(4):045103. PubMed ID: 19191416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of p-y curves of laterally loaded piles in cohesionless soil.
Khari M; Kassim KA; Adnan A
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():917174. PubMed ID: 24574932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alpha shapes: determining 3D shape complexity across morphologically diverse structures.
Gardiner JD; Behnsen J; Brassey CA
BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):184. PubMed ID: 30518326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Droplet morphologies on particles with macroscopic surface roughness.
Stepánek F; Rajniak P
Langmuir; 2006 Jan; 22(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16430249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Description for Rock Joint Roughness Based on Terrestrial Laser Scanner and Image Analysis.
Ge Y; Tang H; Eldin MA; Chen P; Wang L; Wang J
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16999. PubMed ID: 26585247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The derivation of knee joint types from the geometry of the cruciate ligament four-bar system.
Muller M; de Ruijter M
J Theor Biol; 1998 Aug; 193(3):507-18. PubMed ID: 9735277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling diverse responses to filled and outline shapes in macaque V4.
Popovkina DV; Bair W; Pasupathy A
J Neurophysiol; 2019 Mar; 121(3):1059-1077. PubMed ID: 30699004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of postpouring time on the roughness, compressive strength, and diametric tensile strength of dental stone.
De Cesero L; Mota EG; Burnett LH; Spohr AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1573-7. PubMed ID: 25258259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecular dynamics simulation of electro-osmotic flows in rough wall nanochannels.
Kim D; Darve E
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 May; 73(5 Pt 1):051203. PubMed ID: 16802924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface roughness parameters as predictors of anchorage strength in bone: a critical analysis.
Hansson S
J Biomech; 2000 Oct; 33(10):1297-303. PubMed ID: 10899340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of Rock Joint Surfaces by Using Smartphone Structure from Motion (SfM) Photogrammetry.
An P; Fang K; Jiang Q; Zhang H; Zhang Y
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33573128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wetting properties of molecularly rough surfaces.
Svoboda M; Malijevský A; Lísal M
J Chem Phys; 2015 Sep; 143(10):104701. PubMed ID: 26374050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model.
Hansson S; Norton M
J Biomech; 1999 Aug; 32(8):829-36. PubMed ID: 10433425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
