These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25153094)

  • 1. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
    Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.
    Mirelman A; Mentzakis E; Kinter E; Paolucci F; Fordham R; Ozawa S; Ferraz M; Baltussen R; Niessen LW
    Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 22583464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.
    Baji P; García-Goñi M; Gulácsi L; Mentzakis E; Paolucci F
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):791-9. PubMed ID: 26296623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priority-setting for mental health services.
    Mihalopoulos C; Carter R; Pirkis J; Vos T
    J Ment Health; 2013 Apr; 22(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 23323752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Balancing equity and efficiency in health priorities in Ghana: the use of multicriteria decision analysis.
    Jehu-Appiah C; Baltussen R; Acquah C; Aikins M; d'Almeida SA; Bosu WK; Koolman X; Lauer J; Osei D; Adjei S
    Value Health; 2008 Dec; 11(7):1081-7. PubMed ID: 19602214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equity and efficiency preferences of health policy makers in China--a stated preference analysis.
    Paolucci F; Mentzakis E; Defechereux T; Niessen LW
    Health Policy Plan; 2015 Oct; 30(8):1059-66. PubMed ID: 25500745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency and equity considerations in the preferences of health policy-makers in Israel.
    Shmueli A; Golan O; Paolucci F; Mentzakis E
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():18. PubMed ID: 28373904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Principles for priority setting in mental health services and their implications for the least well off.
    Rosenheck RA
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 May; 50(5):653-8. PubMed ID: 10332901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.
    Whitty JA; Lancsar E; Rixon K; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    Patient; 2014; 7(4):365-86. PubMed ID: 24872225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mental health care system optimization from a health-economics perspective: where to sow and where to reap?
    Lokkerbol J; Weehuizen R; Mavranezouli I; Mihalopoulos C; Smit F
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 25153093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards a multi-criteria approach for priority setting: an application to Ghana.
    Baltussen R; Stolk E; Chisholm D; Aikins M
    Health Econ; 2006 Jul; 15(7):689-96. PubMed ID: 16491464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis.
    Defechereux T; Paolucci F; Mirelman A; Youngkong S; Botten G; Hagen TP; Niessen LW
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 12():39. PubMed ID: 22335815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Priority setting in the German healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment.
    Meusel V; Mentzakis E; Baji P; Fiorentini G; Paolucci F
    Int J Health Econ Manag; 2023 Sep; 23(3):411-431. PubMed ID: 37184821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining and broadening the definition of impact from implementing a rational priority setting approach in a healthcare organization.
    Cornelissen E; Mitton C; Davidson A; Reid C; Hole R; Visockas AM; Smith N
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Aug; 114():1-9. PubMed ID: 24887012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Priority setting in healthcare: towards guidelines for the program budgeting and marginal analysis framework.
    Peacock SJ; Mitton C; Ruta D; Donaldson C; Bate A; Hedden L
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Oct; 10(5):539-52. PubMed ID: 20950070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incentives in financing mental health care in Austria.
    Zechmeister I; Oesterle A; Denk P; Katschnig H
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Sep; 5(3):121-9. PubMed ID: 12728199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do the equity-efficiency preferences of the Israeli Basket Committee match those of Israeli health policy makers?
    Shmueli A
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2017; 6():20. PubMed ID: 28469840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
    Ryan M; Scott DA; Reeves C; Bate A; van Teijlingen ER; Russell EM; Napper M; Robb CM
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(5):1-186. PubMed ID: 11262422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision makers' views on health care objectives and budget constraints: results from a pilot study.
    Al MJ; Feenstra T; Brouwer WB
    Health Policy; 2004 Oct; 70(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 15312708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A framework for assessing the effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of behavioral healthcare.
    Aday LA; Begley CE; Lairson DR; Slater CH; Richard AJ; Montoya ID
    Am J Manag Care; 1999 Jun; 5 Spec No():SP25-44. PubMed ID: 10538859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.