These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25153441)
1. [Does embryo morphology constitute a reliable criterion for embryo selection?]. Scalici E; Gala A; Ferrières A; Vincens C; Hamamah S Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Sep; 42(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 25153441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selection of high potential embryos using time-lapse imaging: the era of morphokinetics. Herrero J; Meseguer M Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1030-4. PubMed ID: 23395415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time-lapse embryo imaging technology: does it improve the clinical results? Findikli N; Oral E Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 26(3):138-44. PubMed ID: 24752001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What does morphokinetics add to embryo selection and in-vitro fertilization outcomes? Basile N; Caiazzo M; Meseguer M Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 27(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25699478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. External validation of a time-lapse model; a retrospective study comparing embryo evaluation using a morphokinetic model to standard morphology with live birth as endpoint. Adolfsson E; Porath S; Andershed AN JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Sep; 22(3):205-214. PubMed ID: 29932617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [How can we nowadays select the best embryo to transfer?]. Alter L; Boitrelle F; Sifer C Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014; 42(7-8):515-25. PubMed ID: 24951187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of embryo morphokinetics after in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection in smoking and nonsmoking women. Fréour T; Dessolle L; Lammers J; Lattes S; Barrière P Fertil Steril; 2013 Jun; 99(7):1944-50. PubMed ID: 23465820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Rubio I; Galán A; Larreategui Z; Ayerdi F; Bellver J; Herrero J; Meseguer M Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1287-1294.e5. PubMed ID: 25217875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Time-lapse imaging: Morphokinetic analysis of in vitro fertilization outcomes. Giménez C; Conversa L; Murria L; Meseguer M Fertil Steril; 2023 Aug; 120(2):218-227. PubMed ID: 37364673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel noninvasive embryo selection algorithm combining time-lapse morphokinetics and oxidative status of the spent embryo culture medium. Alegre L; Del Gallego R; Arrones S; Hernández P; Muñoz M; Meseguer M Fertil Steril; 2019 May; 111(5):918-927.e3. PubMed ID: 30922642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selecting embryos with the highest implantation potential using data mining and decision tree based on classical embryo morphology and morphokinetics. Carrasco B; Arroyo G; Gil Y; Gómez MJ; Rodríguez I; Barri PN; Veiga A; Boada M J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Aug; 34(8):983-990. PubMed ID: 28573526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of sperm characteristics on time-lapse embryo morphokinetic parameters and clinical outcome of conventional in vitro fertilization. Nikolova S; Parvanov D; Georgieva V; Ivanova I; Ganeva R; Stamenov G Andrology; 2020 Sep; 8(5):1107-1116. PubMed ID: 32119189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oocyte insemination techniques are related to alterations of embryo developmental timing in an oocyte donation model. Cruz M; Garrido N; Gadea B; Muñoz M; Pérez-Cano I; Meseguer M Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 23953584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Meseguer M; Herrero J; Tejera A; Hilligsøe KM; Ramsing NB; Remohí J Hum Reprod; 2011 Oct; 26(10):2658-71. PubMed ID: 21828117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial. Conaghan J; Chen AA; Willman SP; Ivani K; Chenette PE; Boostanfar R; Baker VL; Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Gvakharia M; Loewke KE; Shen S Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):412-9.e5. PubMed ID: 23721712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No evidence that embryo selection by near-infrared spectroscopy in addition to morphology is able to improve live birth rates: results from an individual patient data meta-analysis. Vergouw CG; Heymans MW; Hardarson T; Sfontouris IA; Economou KA; Ahlström A; Rogberg L; Lainas TG; Sakkas D; Kieslinger DC; Kostelijk EH; Hompes PG; Schats R; Lambalk CB Hum Reprod; 2014 Mar; 29(3):455-61. PubMed ID: 24408316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency of embryo multinucleation detected by time-lapse system and its impact on pregnancy outcome. Ergin EG; Calişkan E; Yalçinkaya E; Oztel Z; Cökelez K; Ozay A; Ozörnek HM Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1029-1033.e1. PubMed ID: 25086787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology. Kirkegaard K; Ahlström A; Ingerslev HJ; Hardarson T Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 25527231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional morphology performs better than morphokinetics for prediction of live birth after day 2 transfer. Ahlstrom A; Park H; Bergh C; Selleskog U; Lundin K Reprod Biomed Online; 2016 Jul; 33(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 27090968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is morphokinetic analysis the answer? Aparicio B; Cruz M; Meseguer M Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Dec; 27(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 24135156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]