BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25153677)

  • 1. Correlation of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with pathology for indeterminate adnexal masses.
    Haggerty AF; Hagemann AR; Chu C; Siegelman ES; Rubin SC
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 25153677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses.
    Adusumilli S; Hussain HK; Caoili EM; Weadock WJ; Murray JP; Johnson TD; Chen Q; Desjardins B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):732-40. PubMed ID: 16928938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complex US adnexal masses during pregnancy: Is pelvic MR imaging accurate for characterization?
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Fedida B; Sadowski E; Chevrier MC; Chabbert-Buffet N; Ballester M; Tavolaro S; Darai E
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():200-208. PubMed ID: 28668416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection and characterization of adnexal masses.
    Funt SA; Hann LE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2002 May; 40(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 12117195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
    Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patterns of misinterpretation of adnexal masses on CT and MR in an academic radiology department.
    Asch E; Levine D; Pedrosa I; Hecht JL; Kruskal J
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):969-80. PubMed ID: 19380241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR evaluation of clinically suspected adnexal masses.
    Scoutt LM; McCarthy SM; Lange R; Bourque A; Schwartz PE
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1994; 18(4):609-18. PubMed ID: 8040448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of size of the adnexal mass on the accuracy of frozen section diagnosis.
    Geomini PM; Zuurendonk LD; Bremer GL; de Graaff J; Kruitwagen RF; Mol BW
    Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Nov; 99(2):362-6. PubMed ID: 16051343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adnexal masses: comparison of specificity of endovaginal US and pelvic MR imaging.
    Jain KA; Friedman DL; Pettinger TW; Alagappan R; Jeffrey RB; Sommer FG
    Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):697-704. PubMed ID: 8430177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adnexal masses in the premenopausal patient.
    Hall TR; Randall TC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 58(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 25608252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improve the diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of adnexal malignancy?
    Dai SY; Hata K; Inubashiri E; Kanenishi K; Shiota A; Ohno M; Yamamoto Y; Nishiyama Y; Ohkawa M; Hata T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Jun; 34(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 18686352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound-based logistic regression model LR2 versus magnetic resonance imaging for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a prospective study.
    Shimada K; Matsumoto K; Mimura T; Ishikawa T; Munechika J; Ohgiya Y; Kushima M; Hirose Y; Asami Y; Iitsuka C; Miyamoto S; Onuki M; Tsunoda H; Matsuoka R; Ichizuka K; Sekizawa A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 23(3):514-521. PubMed ID: 29236181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.
    Sohaib SA; Mills TD; Sahdev A; Webb JA; Vantrappen PO; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Mar; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15710137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of adnexal masses.
    Troiano RN; McCarthy S
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1994 Feb; 15(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 8179941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging of adnexal masses.
    Rajkotia K; Veeramani M; Macura KJ
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 17(6):379-97. PubMed ID: 17417086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of Multiparametric MRI (mMRI) on the Therapeutic Management of Adnexal Masses Detected with Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS): An Interdisciplinary Management Approach.
    Dirrichs T; Bauerschlag D; Maass N; Kuhl CK; Schrading S
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Feb; 29(2):183-197. PubMed ID: 33293256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pelvic MRI as the "gold standard" in the subsequent evaluation of ultrasound-indeterminate adnexal lesions: a systematic review.
    Anthoulakis C; Nikoloudis N
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):661-8. PubMed ID: 24183731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR imaging evaluation of postmenopausal adnexal masses: correlation with final pathologic diagnosis.
    Temma-Asano K; Kimura T; Tsutsui T; Nobunaga T; Samejima Y; Mitsuda N; Kameda T; Ohta Y; Yamamoto T; Saji F; Kamiura S
    Maturitas; 2006 Jan; 53(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16325021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histologic, surgical, and imaging correlations of adnexal masses.
    Asch E; Levine D; Kim Y; Hecht JL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Mar; 27(3):327-42. PubMed ID: 18314510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.