These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25154285)

  • 1. Configural and featural discriminations use the same spatial frequencies: a model observer versus human observer analysis.
    Collin CA; Rainville S; Watier N; Boutet I
    Perception; 2014; 43(6):509-26. PubMed ID: 25154285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
    Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
    Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    Scott LS
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The first 100 milliseconds of a face: on the microgenesis of early face processing.
    Carbon CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Dec; 113(3):859-74. PubMed ID: 22403930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
    Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial attention modulates the temporal sequence of hemispheric asymmetry in configural and featural face processing.
    Wang H; Fu S
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():269-275. PubMed ID: 29374552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance.
    Hole GJ; George PA; Eaves K; Rasek A
    Perception; 2002; 31(10):1221-40. PubMed ID: 12430949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information.
    Boutet I; Collin C; Faubert J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1078-93. PubMed ID: 14674634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognizing degraded faces: the contribution of configural and featural cues.
    Gilad-Gutnick S; Sinha P
    Perception; 2012; 41(12):1497-511. PubMed ID: 23586289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face imagery is based on featural representations.
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18271353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cultural Differences in the Time Course of Configural and Featural Processing for Own-race Faces.
    Wang H; Qiu R; Li W; Li S; Fu S
    Neuroscience; 2020 Oct; 446():157-170. PubMed ID: 32891705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modulations of eye movement patterns by spatial filtering during the learning and testing phases of an old/new face recognition task.
    Lemieux CL; Collin CA; Nelson EA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):536-50. PubMed ID: 25287618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.
    Mondloch CJ; Le Grand R; Maurer D
    Perception; 2002; 31(5):553-66. PubMed ID: 12044096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of band-pass spatial frequency filtering of face and object images on the amplitude of N170.
    Collin CA; Therrien ME; Campbell KB; Hamm JP
    Perception; 2012; 41(6):717-32. PubMed ID: 23094460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.