These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2515512)
1. National Practitioner Data Bank highlights risk management meeting. Berman S QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1989 Dec; 15(12):392-7. PubMed ID: 2515512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance implications of federal peer review laws. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data Bank. Snelson E Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1603858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rural hospitals' experience with the National Practitioner Data Bank. Neighbor WE; Baldwin LM; West PA; Hart LG Am J Public Health; 1997 Apr; 87(4):663-6. PubMed ID: 9146450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Managing care and the risk for managing quality. Mulholland DM Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 1603857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Facing the limits on uses of medical and peer review information: are high technology and confidentiality on a collision course? Brown LC; Stanton WC; Paye W Whittier Law Rev; 1997; 19(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 12071205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolution of quality assurance professionals in Australia. Aust Clin Rev; 1986 Mar; 6(20):46-8. PubMed ID: 3753317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. No secrets: National Practitioner Data Bank. Snelson E Ohio Med; 1990 Aug; 86(8):580-2. PubMed ID: 2398988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now? Brennan ED QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality assessment in the '90s: legal implications for hospitals. Truhe JV J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Jun; 26(6):171-80. PubMed ID: 10127079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance--what lies ahead? A Canadian legal respective. Batty GR Health Law Can; 1985; 5(4):108-12. PubMed ID: 10311238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assurance professionals in the USA. Prescott AR World Hosp; 1985 Nov; 21(4):40-1. PubMed ID: 10276034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of the national practitioner data bank in the credentialing process. Waters TM; Warnecke RB; Parsons J; Almagor O; Budetti PP Am J Med Qual; 2006; 21(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 16401703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) in summary. Milazzo VL Natl Med Leg J; 1990; 1(2):10. PubMed ID: 2088552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospital peer review and clinical privileges actions: to report or not report. Brennan TA JAMA; 1999 Jul; 282(4):381-2. PubMed ID: 10432038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Resolving the national practitioner data bank dilemma. Brasher P; Sweeris CL AAPPO J; 1991; 1(4):27-33. PubMed ID: 10149635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lessons from a high-volume credentialing environment. Shroyer S QRC Advis; 1995 Jul; 11(9):1, 6-8. PubMed ID: 10143288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data. Stevens M Health Law Can; 1989; 9(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 10313023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality Assurance. Historical perspective and critical issues. Burakoff RP; Demby NA Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Jul; 29(3):427-36. PubMed ID: 3861388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]