These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25156094)

  • 1. A technique to ensure the reproducibility of a cast post and core.
    Naas HM; Dashti MH; Hashemian R; Hifeda NY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1585-7. PubMed ID: 25156094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of cast posts and cores using a new investigative method.
    Pitigoi-Aron G; Streacker AB; Schulze KA; Geissberger M
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):e153-7. PubMed ID: 22623471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simplified technique for refabrication of cast posts and cores.
    Sabbak SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):686-7. PubMed ID: 10842140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indirect fabrication of multiple post-and-core patterns with a vinyl polysiloxane matrix.
    Sabbak SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 12474010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fabricating a fiber-reinforced post and zirconia core with CAD/CAM technology.
    Lee JH; Sohn DS; Lee CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):683-5. PubMed ID: 24680166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An acrylic resin shell with guide extensions for accurate positioning of provisional restorations.
    Infante L; Lee H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):340-2. PubMed ID: 22024185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A technique for verifying and correcting a milled polyurethane definitive cast for nonsegmental implant restoration in an edentulous jaw.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Metz MJ; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):658-62. PubMed ID: 24836533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
    Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A technique to remove a fractured acrylic resin pattern from the post space.
    Park JI; Madden JC; Yoon TH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):538-9. PubMed ID: 24120070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
    Al-Sowygh ZH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
    Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning of root canal impression for the fabrication of a resin CAD-CAM-customized post-and-core.
    Falcão Spina DR; da Costa RG; Correr GM; Rached RN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):242-245. PubMed ID: 29475760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative adaptation accuracy of acrylic denture bases evaluated by two different methods.
    Lee CJ; Bok SB; Bae JY; Lee HH
    Dent Mater J; 2010 Aug; 29(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 20675954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dimensional stability of complete denture permanent acrylic resin denture bases; A comparison of dimensions before and after a second curing cycle.
    Fenlon MR; Juszczyk AS; Rodriguez JM; Curtis RV
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 20397501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of excessive movable tissue: a modified impression technique.
    Shum MH; Pow EH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):387-9. PubMed ID: 24461949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the Association Between the Tray and Impression Techniques on Angulated Implants Using the All-on-Four System.
    de Avila ED; Castanharo SM; Casalle N; Vasconcelos JA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():382-5. PubMed ID: 24641165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of transparent vinyl polysiloxane in a minimally invasive approach for creating composite resin undercuts for partial removable dental prostheses.
    Varjão FM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jan; 107(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22230916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of polyvinyl siloxane impression material on the polymerization of composite resin.
    Chen L; Kleverlaan CJ; Liang K; Yang D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):552-558. PubMed ID: 27765393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.