These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25156155)

  • 1. Connections between permutation and t-tests: relevance to adaptive methods.
    Proschan M; Glimm E; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(27):4734-42. PubMed ID: 25156155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To permute or not to permute.
    Huang Y; Xu H; Calian V; Hsu JC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2244-8. PubMed ID: 16870938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple procedures for blinded sample size adjustment that do not affect the type I error rate.
    Kieser M; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(23):3571-81. PubMed ID: 14652861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size determination in group-sequential clinical trials with two co-primary endpoints.
    Asakura K; Hamasaki T; Sugimoto T; Hayashi K; Evans SR; Sozu T
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(17):2897-913. PubMed ID: 24676799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size recalculation using conditional power.
    Denne JS
    Stat Med; 2001 Sep 15-30; 20(17-18):2645-60. PubMed ID: 11523074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small- and moderate-sized data sets.
    Potter DM
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 15515134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On permutation tests for comparing restricted mean survival time with small sample from randomized trials.
    Horiguchi M; Uno H
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(20):2655-2670. PubMed ID: 32432805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust nonparametric tests of general linear model coefficients: A comparison of permutation methods and test statistics.
    Helwig NE
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 201():116030. PubMed ID: 31330243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size recalculation in sequential diagnostic trials.
    Tang LL; Liu A
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jan; 11(1):151-63. PubMed ID: 19822693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exact test for comparing two predictive values in small-size clinical trials.
    Takahashi K; Yamamoto K
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Jan; 19(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 31642578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size determination based on rank tests in clinical trials.
    Wang H; Chen B; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):735-51. PubMed ID: 14584719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method.
    Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of permutation (randomization) tests in clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology.
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1994 Sep; 21(9):673-86. PubMed ID: 7820947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rank-based permutation approaches for non-parametric factorial designs.
    Umlauft M; Konietschke F; Pauly M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):368-390. PubMed ID: 28295183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Data-driven analysis strategies for proportion studies in adaptive group sequential test designs.
    Wassmer G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):585-603. PubMed ID: 14584710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.
    Brannath W; Bauer P
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 15339294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blinded sample size recalculation in clinical trials incorporating historical data.
    Hees K; Kieser M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 63():2-7. PubMed ID: 28735110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculation for the van Elteren test adjusting for ties.
    Zhao YD; Rahardja D; Mei Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1112-9. PubMed ID: 18991111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.