These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25157302)

  • 1. Long-term response-stimulus associations can influence distractor-response bindings.
    Moeller B; Frings C
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2014; 10(2):68-80. PubMed ID: 25157302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration.
    Moeller B; Frings C; Pfister R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):464-79. PubMed ID: 26501840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings.
    Giesen C; Frings C; Rothermund K
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 22081277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distractor-based retrieval in action control: the influence of encoding specificity.
    Laub R; Frings C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 30173278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From hands to feet: Abstract response representations in distractor-response bindings.
    Moeller B; Hommel B; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():69-75. PubMed ID: 26047973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brightness versus darkness: The influence of stimulus intensity on the distractor-response binding effect.
    Laub R; Frings C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jan; 212():103224. PubMed ID: 33316459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings.
    Giesen C; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):645-659. PubMed ID: 24294915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.
    Moeller B; Schächinger H; Frings C
    J Vis Exp; 2014 May; (87):. PubMed ID: 24893586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of stress on distractor-response bindings.
    Singh T; Domes G; Frings C
    Stress; 2021 Nov; 24(6):795-804. PubMed ID: 34060422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five shades of grey: Generalization in distractor-based retrieval of S-R episodes.
    Singh T; Moeller B; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2307-2312. PubMed ID: 27631631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binding targets' responses to distractors' locations: distractor response bindings in a location-priming task.
    Frings C; Möller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2176-83. PubMed ID: 21097861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A high-loaded hemisphere successfully ignores distractors.
    Nishimura R; Yoshizaki K
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):953-61. PubMed ID: 20580269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets.
    Frings C; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Oct; 60(10):1367-77. PubMed ID: 17853245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictability reduces event file retrieval.
    Schmalbrock P; Hommel B; Münchau A; Beste C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1073-1087. PubMed ID: 36577916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissecting stimulus-response binding effects: Grouping by color separately impacts integration and retrieval processes.
    Laub R; Frings C; Moeller B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1474-1488. PubMed ID: 29687358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responses of intraparietal neurons to saccadic targets and visual distractors.
    Platt ML; Glimcher PW
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Sep; 78(3):1574-89. PubMed ID: 9310444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.
    Lega C; Ferrante O; Marini F; Santandrea E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L
    J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(38):7591-7603. PubMed ID: 31387915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of stimulus type on effects of flanker, flanker position, and trial sequence in a saccadic eye movement task.
    Peschke C; Hilgetag CC; Olk B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(11):2253-67. PubMed ID: 23565974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What Belongs Together Retrieves Together - The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval.
    Schmalbrock P; Kiesel A; Frings C
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):28. PubMed ID: 36072092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.