These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
784 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25158303)
1. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users. Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users. Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study. Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study. Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with long inter-stage interval between two implants. Kim JS; Kim LS; Jeong SW Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Feb; 77(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 23137855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement of cognitive function after cochlear implantation in elderly patients. Mosnier I; Bebear JP; Marx M; Fraysse B; Truy E; Lina-Granade G; Mondain M; Sterkers-Artières F; Bordure P; Robier A; Godey B; Meyer B; Frachet B; Poncet-Wallet C; Bouccara D; Sterkers O JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 May; 141(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25763680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants. Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-Modal and Intra-Modal Characteristics of Visual Function and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened, Cochlear Implant Users. Kim MB; Shim HY; Jin SH; Kang S; Woo J; Han JC; Lee JY; Kim M; Cho YS; Moon IJ; Hong SH PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148466. PubMed ID: 26848755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children. Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users. Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users. Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripheral Neural Synchrony in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users. He S; Skidmore J; Bruce IC; Oleson JJ; Yuan Y Ear Hear; 2024 Sep-Oct 01; 45(5):1125-1137. PubMed ID: 38503720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study. Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recovery from forward masking in elderly cochlear implant users. Lee ER; Friedland DR; Runge CL Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 22410729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m). Jansen S; Koning R; Wouters J; van Wieringen A Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]