BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25158767)

  • 1. Indications for the use of MemoryShape breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: long-term clinical outcomes of shaped versus round silicone breast implants.
    Caplin DA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Sep; 134(3 Suppl):27S-37S. PubMed ID: 25158767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mentor Contour Profile Gel Implants: Clinical Outcomes at 10 Years.
    Hammond DC; Canady JW; Love TR; Wixtrom RN; Caplin DA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1142-1150. PubMed ID: 29176413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mentor Contour Profile Gel implants: clinical outcomes at 6 years.
    Hammond DC; Migliori MM; Caplin DA; Garcia ME; Phillips CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Jun; 129(6):1381-1391. PubMed ID: 22327894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten-year Core Study Data for Sientra's Food and Drug Administration-Approved Round and Shaped Breast Implants with Cohesive Silicone Gel.
    Stevens WG; Calobrace MB; Alizadeh K; Zeidler KR; Harrington JL; d'Incelli RC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):7S-19S. PubMed ID: 29595714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up.
    Caplin DA; Calobrace MB; Wixtrom RN; Estes MM; Canady JW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):556-566. PubMed ID: 33620918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years.
    Maxwell GP; Van Natta BW; Murphy DK; Slicton A; Bengtson BP
    Aesthet Surg J; 2012 Aug; 32(6):709-17. PubMed ID: 22751081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eight-year follow-up data from the U.S. clinical trial for Sientra's FDA-approved round and shaped implants with high-strength cohesive silicone gel.
    Stevens WG; Harrington J; Alizadeh K; Broadway D; Zeidler K; Godinez TB
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 May; 35 Suppl 1():S3-10. PubMed ID: 25948657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nine-Year Core Study Data for Sientra's FDA-Approved Round and Shaped Implants with High-Strength Cohesive Silicone Gel.
    Stevens WG; Calobrace MB; Harrington J; Alizadeh K; Zeidler KR; d'Incelli RC
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 26961987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Results of Mentor MemoryGel Xtra Breast Implants From the GLOW Clinical Trial.
    Alderman A; Caplin D; Hammond DC; Keane A; Turetzky J; Kane WJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):NP1021-NP1032. PubMed ID: 37610252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eight-Year Safety Data for Round and Anatomical Silicone Gel Breast Implants.
    Duteille F; Perrot P; Bacheley MH; Stewart S
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Feb; 38(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 29040345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Mentor Core Study on Silicone MemoryGel Breast Implants.
    Cunningham B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec; 120(7 Suppl 1):19S-29S. PubMed ID: 18090810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomic Implants in Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Outcomes and Aesthetic Results Compared to Smooth Round Silicone Implants.
    Agochukwu-Nwubah N; Boustany A; Wetzel M; Maus J; Rinker B
    Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jul; 39(8):NP322-NP330. PubMed ID: 30874722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant core study.
    Maxwell GP; Van Natta BW; Bengtson BP; Murphy DK
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Feb; 35(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 25717116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-year follow-up data from the U.S. clinical trial for Sientra's U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved Silimed® brand round and shaped implants with high-strength silicone gel.
    Stevens WG; Harrington J; Alizadeh K; Berger L; Broadway D; Hester TR; Kress D; d'Incelli R; Kuhne J; Beckstrand M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5):973-981. PubMed ID: 23096598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.
    Doren EL; Pierpont YN; Shivers SC; Berger LH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Nov; 136(5):957-966. PubMed ID: 26505700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years.
    Cunningham B; McCue J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 May; 33(3):440-4. PubMed ID: 19437068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical experience with a fourth-generation textured silicone gel breast implant: a review of 1012 Mentor MemoryGel breast implants.
    Stevens WG; Pacella SJ; Gear AJ; Freeman ME; McWhorter C; Tenenbaum MJ; Stoker DA
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 19083592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra high-profile breast implants.
    Largent JA; Reisman NR; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Jewell ML
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 May; 33(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 23559355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Mentor Study on Contour Profile Gel Silicone MemoryGel Breast Implants.
    Cunningham B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec; 120(7 Suppl 1):33S-39S. PubMed ID: 18090812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
    Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.