These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25158980)

  • 21. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Degree of Hearing Loss Affects Bilateral Hearing Aid Benefits in Ecologically Relevant Laboratory Conditions.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM; Shehorn J; Dittberner AB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3834-3850. PubMed ID: 31596645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19773657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development and evaluation of the LiSN & learn auditory training software for deficit-specific remediation of binaural processing deficits in children: preliminary findings.
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(10):678-96. PubMed ID: 22212767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, noise reduction, and the directional microphone on horizontal localization performance in hearing aid wearers.
    Keidser G; Rohrseitz K; Dillon H; Hamacher V; Carter L; Rass U; Convery E
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):563-79. PubMed ID: 17062498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Localization of virtual sound sources with bilateral hearing aids in realistic acoustical scenes.
    Mueller MF; Kegel A; Schimmel SM; Dillier N; Hofbauer M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4732-42. PubMed ID: 22712946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Kuvadia S; Gygi B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):509-19. PubMed ID: 25633579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients.
    Hol MK; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(5):274-81. PubMed ID: 15316200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sound localization in unilateral deafness with the Baha or TransEar device.
    Battista RA; Mullins K; Wiet RM; Sabin A; Kim J; Rauch V
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jan; 139(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 23329093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of CIC and BTE hearing aids for three-dimensional localization of speech.
    Best V; Kalluri S; McLachlan S; Valentine S; Edwards B; Carlile S
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):723-32. PubMed ID: 20515424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.
    Brimijoin WO; Akeroyd MA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):588-600. PubMed ID: 27406664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Functional hearing in the classroom: assistive listening devices for students with hearing impairment in a mainstream school setting.
    Zanin J; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):723-729. PubMed ID: 27609144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.