BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25158992)

  • 1. Comparison of intubation performance by emergency medicine residents using gum elastic bougie versus standard stylet in simulated easy and difficult intubation scenarios.
    Walsh R; Cookman L; Luerssen E
    Emerg Med Australas; 2014 Oct; 26(5):446-9. PubMed ID: 25158992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of intubation performance by junior emergency department doctors using gum elastic bougie versus stylet reinforced endotracheal tube insertion techniques.
    Brazil V; Grobler C; Greenslade J; Burke J
    Emerg Med Australas; 2012 Apr; 24(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 22487670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of a fiberoptic stylet and a bougie as adjuncts to direct laryngoscopy in a manikin-simulated difficult airway.
    Kovacs G; Law JA; McCrossin C; Vu M; Leblanc D; Gao J
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Dec; 50(6):676-85. PubMed ID: 17681639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of a gum-elastic bougie for difficult airway management in infants: a simulation-based crossover analysis.
    Komasawa N; Hyoda A; Matsunami S; Majima N; Minami T
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():617805. PubMed ID: 26495306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Success of the gum elastic bougie as a rescue airway in the emergency department.
    Shah KH; Kwong BM; Hazan A; Newman DH; Wiener D
    J Emerg Med; 2011 Jan; 40(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18996675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of four methods of endotracheal tube passage in simulated airways: There is room for improved techniques.
    Kingma K; Hofmeyr R; Zeng IS; Coomarasamy C; Brainard A
    Emerg Med Australas; 2017 Dec; 29(6):650-657. PubMed ID: 29113010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Difficulties with gum elastic bougie intubation in an academic emergency department.
    Shah KH; Kwong B; Hazan A; Batista R; Newman DH; Wiener D
    J Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 41(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 20580514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Use of the gum elastic bougie].
    Mizunuma M; Senami K
    Masui; 2013 Jun; 62(6):751-6. PubMed ID: 23815008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of bougie-assisted intubation with traditional endotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway.
    Messa MJ; Kupas DF; Dunham DL
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 21067319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the storz video Macintosh laryngoscope for use in difficult airways: A human simulator study.
    Bair AE; Olmsted K; Brown CA; Barker T; Pallin D; Walls RM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1134-7. PubMed ID: 21064263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Airway Scope, gum elastic bougie and fibreoptic bronchoscope in simulated difficult tracheal intubation: a manikin study.
    Koyama Y; Inagawa G; Miyashita T; Kikuchi T; Miura N; Miki T; Kurihara R; Kamiya Y; Goto T
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Sep; 62(9):936-9. PubMed ID: 17697222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of effectiveness of intubation by way of "Gum Elastic Bougie" and "Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway" in endotracheal intubation of patients with simulated cervical trauma].
    Sut EY; Gunal S; Yazar MA; Dikmen B
    Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2017; 67(3):238-245. PubMed ID: 28040237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
    Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utility of gum-elastic bougie for tracheal intubation during chest compressions in a manikin: a randomized crossover trial.
    Komasawa N; Cho T; Mihara R; Minami T
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Jan; 34(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 26456492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the king vision video laryngoscope with the macintosh laryngoscope.
    Murphy LD; Kovacs GJ; Reardon PM; Law JA
    J Emerg Med; 2014 Aug; 47(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 24742495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator.
    Ono Y; Shinohara K; Shimada J; Inoue S; Kotani J
    BMC Emerg Med; 2020 May; 20(1):34. PubMed ID: 32375651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the Seeing Optical Stylet and the gum elastic bougie in simulated difficult tracheal intubation: a manikin study.
    Evans A; Morris S; Petterson J; Hall JE
    Anaesthesia; 2006 May; 61(5):478-81. PubMed ID: 16674624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of intubation success of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the difficult airway using high-fidelity simulation.
    Narang AT; Oldeg PF; Medzon R; Mahmood AR; Spector JA; Robinett DA
    Simul Healthc; 2009; 4(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 19680083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Patients With Difficult Airways Undergoing Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Driver BE; Prekker ME; Klein LR; Reardon RF; Miner JR; Fagerstrom ET; Cleghorn MR; McGill JW; Cole JB
    JAMA; 2018 Jun; 319(21):2179-2189. PubMed ID: 29800096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of bougie first approach for endotracheal intubation with video laryngoscopy during continuous chest compression: a randomized crossover manikin trial.
    Xu X; Ma H; Zhang Y; Liu W; Jung B; Li X; Shen L
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 May; 24(1):181. PubMed ID: 38773386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.