BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25159044)

  • 1. Antiseptics for treating infected wounds: Efficacy on biofilms and effect of pH.
    Percival SL; Finnegan S; Donelli G; Vuotto C; Rimmer S; Lipsky BA
    Crit Rev Microbiol; 2016; 42(2):293-309. PubMed ID: 25159044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [THE ROLE OF ANTISEPTICS AND STRATEGY OF BIOFILM REMOVAL IN CHRONIC WOUND].
    Kucisec-Tepes N
    Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 27220188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
    Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities.
    Hill KE; Malic S; McKee R; Rennison T; Harding KG; Williams DW; Thomas DW
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun; 65(6):1195-206. PubMed ID: 20378671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wound care antiseptics - performance differences against Staphylococcus aureus in biofilm.
    Vestby LK; Nesse LL
    Acta Vet Scand; 2015 May; 57(1):22. PubMed ID: 25935654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Update on the role of antiseptics in the management of chronic wounds with critical colonisation and/or biofilm.
    Alves PJ; Barreto RT; Barrois BM; Gryson LG; Meaume S; Monstrey SJ
    Int Wound J; 2021 Jun; 18(3):342-358. PubMed ID: 33314723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Silver against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.
    Bjarnsholt T; Kirketerp-Møller K; Kristiansen S; Phipps R; Nielsen AK; Jensen PØ; Høiby N; Givskov M
    APMIS; 2007 Aug; 115(8):921-8. PubMed ID: 17696948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds.
    Percival SL; Hill KE; Williams DW; Hooper SJ; Thomas DW; Costerton JW
    Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(5):647-57. PubMed ID: 22985037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The wound-healing effects of a next-generation anti-biofilm silver Hydrofiber wound dressing on deep partial-thickness wounds using a porcine model.
    Davis SC; Li J; Gil J; Valdes J; Solis M; Higa A; Bowler P
    Int Wound J; 2018 Oct; 15(5):834-839. PubMed ID: 29893025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of pH on wound healing, biofilms, and antimicrobial efficacy.
    Percival SL; McCarty S; Hunt JA; Woods EJ
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 24611980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In Vitro Efficacy of Bacterial Cellulose Dressings Chemisorbed with Antiseptics against Biofilm Formed by Pathogens Isolated from Chronic Wounds.
    Dydak K; Junka A; Dydak A; Brożyna M; Paleczny J; Fijalkowski K; Kubielas G; Aniołek O; Bartoszewicz M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Apr; 22(8):. PubMed ID: 33924416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Topical antimicrobial therapy for treating chronic wounds.
    Lipsky BA; Hoey C
    Clin Infect Dis; 2009 Nov; 49(10):1541-9. PubMed ID: 19842981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biofilm in wound care.
    Rajpaul K
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Mar; Suppl Wound Care():S6, S8, S10-1. PubMed ID: 25757387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cadexomer iodine effectively reduces bacterial biofilm in porcine wounds ex vivo and in vivo.
    Roche ED; Woodmansey EJ; Yang Q; Gibson DJ; Zhang H; Schultz GS
    Int Wound J; 2019 Jun; 16(3):674-683. PubMed ID: 30868761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hard-to-heal wounds, biofilm and wound healing: an intricate interrelationship.
    Azevedo MM; Lisboa C; Cobrado L; Pina-Vaz C; Rodrigues A
    Br J Nurs; 2020 Mar; 29(5):S6-S13. PubMed ID: 32167817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Approach to chronic wound infections.
    Leaper D; Assadian O; Edmiston CE
    Br J Dermatol; 2015 Aug; 173(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 25772951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
    Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION ANTIMICROBIAL WOUND DRESSING.
    Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler IP
    Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 27220190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual role of iodine, silver, chlorhexidine and octenidine as antimicrobial and antiprotease agents.
    Pavlík V; Sojka M; Mazúrová M; Velebný V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211055. PubMed ID: 30703114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Topical antimicrobials in the control of wound bioburden.
    White RJ; Cutting K; Kingsley A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Aug; 52(8):26-58. PubMed ID: 16896238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.