These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25159173)

  • 1. Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children.
    Levi SV
    J Child Lang; 2015 Jul; 42(4):843-72. PubMed ID: 25159173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Language Ability and the Familiar Talker Advantage: Generalizing to Unfamiliar Talkers Is What Matters.
    Levi SV; Harel D; Schwartz RG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 May; 62(5):1427-1436. PubMed ID: 31021674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.
    Case J; Seyfarth S; Levi SV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 29800358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revisiting the talker recognition advantage in bilingual infants.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Feb; 214():105276. PubMed ID: 34507181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Other Accent Effect in Talker Recognition: Now You See It, Now You Don't.
    Yu ME; Schertz J; Johnson EK
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12986. PubMed ID: 34170043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification and discrimination of bilingual talkers across languages.
    Winters SJ; Levi SV; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4524-38. PubMed ID: 18537401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Talker and accent familiarity yield advantages for voice identity perception: A voice sorting study.
    Njie S; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jan; 51(1):175-187. PubMed ID: 35274221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural basis of language familiarity effects on voice recognition: An fNIRS study.
    Meng Y; Liang C; Chen W; Liu Z; Yang C; Hu J; Gao Z; Gao S
    Cortex; 2024 Jul; 176():1-10. PubMed ID: 38723449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit and explicit learning in talker identification.
    Lee JJ; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):2002-2015. PubMed ID: 35534783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of talker familiarity on spoken word identification in younger and older listeners.
    Yonan CA; Sommers MS
    Psychol Aging; 2000 Mar; 15(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 10755292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.