These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25159288)

  • 1. Bias-free double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: performance enhancement from voluntary and involuntary attention.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():204-12. PubMed ID: 25159288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.
    Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Involuntary cueing effects on accuracy measures: Stimulus and task dependence.
    Kerzel D; Zarian L; Souto D
    J Vis; 2009 Oct; 9(11):16.1-16. PubMed ID: 20053079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adults with dyslexia can use cues to orient and constrain attention but have a smaller and weaker attention spotlight.
    Moores E; Tsouknida E; Romani C
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):55-65. PubMed ID: 25872179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms.
    Prinzmetal W; McCool C; Park S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 15702964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary attention with uncertainty: peripheral cues improve perception of masked letters, but may impair perception of low-contrast letters.
    Kerzel D; Gauch A; Buetti S
    J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):12. PubMed ID: 21047744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of spatial congruency on saccade and visual discrimination performance in a dual-task paradigm.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():100-11. PubMed ID: 25449339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involuntary attention enhances identification accuracy for unmasked low contrast letters using non-predictive peripheral cues.
    Pack W; Carney T; Klein SA
    Vision Res; 2013 Aug; 89():79-89. PubMed ID: 23872240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rethinking human visual attention: spatial cueing effects and optimality of decisions by honeybees, monkeys and humans.
    Eckstein MP; Mack SC; Liston DB; Bogush L; Menzel R; Krauzlis RJ
    Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():5-19. PubMed ID: 23298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight.
    Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Weiskrantz L
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(6):831-5. PubMed ID: 15037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition of return exaggerates change blindness.
    Smith DT; Schenk T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 20336583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncued and cued dynamics measured by response classification.
    Shimozaki SS
    J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):10. PubMed ID: 20884585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.