BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25159706)

  • 1. Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study.
    Gierach GL; Li H; Loud JT; Greene MH; Chow CK; Lan L; Prindiville SA; Eng-Wong J; Soballe PW; Giambartolomei C; Mai PL; Galbo CE; Nichols K; Calzone KA; Olopade OI; Gail MH; Giger ML
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(4):424. PubMed ID: 25159706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic density and breast cancer in women from high risk families.
    Ramón Y Cajal T; Chirivella I; Miranda J; Teule A; Izquierdo Á; Balmaña J; Sánchez-Heras AB; Llort G; Fisas D; Lope V; Hernández-Agudo E; Juan-Fita MJ; Tena I; Robles L; Guillén-Ponce C; Pérez-Segura P; Luque-Molina MS; Hernando-Polo S; Salinas M; Brunet J; Salas-Trejo MD; Barnadas A; Pollán M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Jul; 17(1):93. PubMed ID: 26163143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Wolverton DE; Weber BL; Metz CE; Zhong W; Cummings SA
    Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):519-26. PubMed ID: 12409590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
    Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
    Mitchell G; Antoniou AC; Warren R; Peock S; Brown J; Davies R; Mattison J; Cook M; Warsi I; Evans DG; Eccles D; Douglas F; Paterson J; Hodgson S; Izatt L; Cole T; Burgess L; Eeles R; Easton DF
    Cancer Res; 2006 Feb; 66(3):1866-72. PubMed ID: 16452249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.
    Li H; Giger ML; Huo Z; Olopade OI; Lan L; Weber BL; Bonta I
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 15070253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography.
    Tilanus-Linthorst M; Verhoog L; Obdeijn IM; Bartels K; Menke-Pluymers M; Eggermont A; Klijn J; Meijers-Heijboer H; van der Kwast T; Brekelmans C
    Int J Cancer; 2002 Nov; 102(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 12353239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic density does not differ between unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at low-to-average risk of breast cancer.
    Gierach GL; Loud JT; Chow CK; Prindiville SA; Eng-Wong J; Soballe PW; Giambartolomei C; Mai PL; Galbo CE; Nichols K; Calzone KA; Vachon C; Gail MH; Greene MH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Aug; 123(1):245-55. PubMed ID: 20130984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Wolverton DE; Zhong W; Cumming S; Olopade OI
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 10659732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of image-based phenotypes of mammographic density and parenchymal patterns in distinguishing between BRCA1/2 cases, unilateral cancer cases, and controls.
    Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Janardanan J; Sennett CA
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2014 Oct; 1(3):031009. PubMed ID: 26158050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: the UK MARIBS study.
    Thompson DJ; Leach MO; Kwan-Lim G; Gayther SA; Ramus SJ; Warsi I; Lennard F; Khazen M; Bryant E; Reed S; Boggis CR; Evans DG; Eeles RA; Easton DF; Warren RM;
    Breast Cancer Res; 2009; 11(6):R80. PubMed ID: 19903338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.
    Nielsen M; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Chernoff K; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M; Karsdal MA
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):R37. PubMed ID: 24713478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
    JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of mammographic density among women with a strong family history of breast cancer.
    Moran O; Eisen A; Demsky R; Blackmore K; Knight JA; Panchal S; Ginsburg O; Zbuk K; Yaffe M; Metcalfe KA; Narod SA; Kotsopoulos J
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):631. PubMed ID: 31242899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status.
    Malkov S; Shepherd JA; Scott CG; Tamimi RM; Ma L; Bertrand KA; Couch F; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Fan B; Norman A; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM; Kerlikowske K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 27923387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
    Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Chinander MR
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 18175183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.