BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25160335)

  • 1. Protocol feasibility workflow using an automated multi-country patient cohort system.
    Soto-Rey I; Trinczek B; Karakoyun T; Dugas M; Fritz F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():985-9. PubMed ID: 25160335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Query engine optimization for the EHR4CR protocol feasibility scenario.
    Soto-Rey I; Bache R; Dugas M; Fritz F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1080. PubMed ID: 23920854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency and effectiveness evaluation of an automated multi-country patient count cohort system.
    Soto-Rey I; Trinczek B; Girardeau Y; Zapletal E; Ammour N; Doods J; Dugas M; Fritz F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 May; 15():44. PubMed ID: 25928269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Textual inference for eligibility criteria resolution in clinical trials.
    Shivade C; Hebert C; Lopetegui M; de Marneffe MC; Fosler-Lussier E; Lai AM
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Dec; 58 Suppl(Suppl):S211-S218. PubMed ID: 26376462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A European inventory of data elements for patient recruitment.
    Doods J; Lafitte C; Ulliac-Sagnes N; Proeve J; Botteri F; Walls R; Sykes A; Dugas M; Fritz F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():506-10. PubMed ID: 25991199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Web-based multi-site feasibility questionnaire tool.
    Soto-Rey I; Trinczek B; Amo JI; Bauselas J; Dugas M; Fritz F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 212():88-93. PubMed ID: 26063262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supporting patient screening to identify suitable clinical trials.
    Bucur A; Van Leeuwen J; Chen NZ; Claerhout B; De Schepper K; Perez-Rey D; Alonso-Calvo R; Pugliano L; Saini K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():823-7. PubMed ID: 25160302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recruit--An Ontology Based Information Retrieval System for Clinical Trials Recruitment.
    Patrão DF; Oleynik M; Massicano F; Morassi Sasso A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():534-8. PubMed ID: 26262108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using electronic health records for clinical research: the case of the EHR4CR project.
    De Moor G; Sundgren M; Kalra D; Schmidt A; Dugas M; Claerhout B; Karakoyun T; Ohmann C; Lastic PY; Ammour N; Kush R; Dupont D; Cuggia M; Daniel C; Thienpont G; Coorevits P
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():162-73. PubMed ID: 25463966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-benefit assessment of using electronic health records data for clinical research versus current practices: Contribution of the Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) European Project.
    Beresniak A; Schmidt A; Proeve J; Bolanos E; Patel N; Ammour N; Sundgren M; Ericson M; Karakoyun T; Coorevits P; Kalra D; De Moor G; Dupont D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2016 Jan; 46():85-91. PubMed ID: 26600286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conformity between protocol eligibility criteria for electronic patient identification: a comparison of clinical trials.
    Kamauu A; Agbor S; Kamauu A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1167. PubMed ID: 23920941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Text Mining of the Electronic Health Record: An Information Extraction Approach for Automated Identification and Subphenotyping of HFpEF Patients for Clinical Trials.
    Jonnalagadda SR; Adupa AK; Garg RP; Corona-Cox J; Shah SJ
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2017 Jun; 10(3):313-321. PubMed ID: 28585184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic Selection of Clinical Trials Based on A Semantic Web Approach.
    Cuggia M; Campillo-Gimenez B; Bouzille G; Besana P; Jouini W; Dufour JC; Zekri O; Gibaud I; Garde C; Duvauferier R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():564-8. PubMed ID: 26262114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient recruitment workflow with and without a patient recruitment system.
    Trinczek B; Schulte B; Breil B; Dugas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():1124. PubMed ID: 23920898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First experiences in implementing a software-based support for patient recruitment at Heidelberg university hospital.
    Schreiweis B; Grüber G; Bergh B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():1147-9. PubMed ID: 22874382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Requirements for a patient recruitment system.
    Schreiweis B; Bergh B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():521-5. PubMed ID: 25991202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients.
    Ni Y; Wright J; Perentesis J; Lingren T; Deleger L; Kaiser M; Kohane I; Solti I
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Apr; 15():28. PubMed ID: 25881112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applicability of different types of Patient Records for Patient Recruitment Systems.
    Schreiweis B; Bergh B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():884. PubMed ID: 26262186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of eligibility criteria from ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Doods J; Dugas M; Fritz F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():853-7. PubMed ID: 25160308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic query generation from eligibility criteria in clinical trials.
    Patel CO; Cimino JJ
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():1070. PubMed ID: 18694168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.