These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25160660)

  • 1. Differences in volatile methyl siloxane (VMS) profiles in biogas from landfills and anaerobic digesters and energetics of VMS transformations.
    Tansel B; Surita SC
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2271-7. PubMed ID: 25160660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic release of siloxanes in the form of biogas from simulated municipal-solid-waste landfill and the corresponding driving mechanism.
    Kong Q; He J; Chen H; Zhou D; Yu C; Zhang Z; Yao J; Shen D
    Waste Manag; 2024 Jul; 184():101-108. PubMed ID: 38810395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation of volatile methyl siloxanes in biogas and the ambient environment in a landfill.
    Wang N; Tan L; Xie L; Wang Y; Ellis T
    J Environ Sci (China); 2020 May; 91():54-61. PubMed ID: 32172982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of microwave pre-treatment of thickened waste activated sludge on biogas production from co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, thickened waste activated sludge and municipal sludge.
    Ara E; Sartaj M; Kennedy K
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Dec; 32(12):1200-9. PubMed ID: 25398411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal and determination of trimethylsilanol from the landfill gas.
    Piechota G; Hagmann M; Buczkowski R
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Jan; 103(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 22033372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selectivity and limitations of carbon sorption tubes for capturing siloxanes in biogas during field sampling.
    Tansel B; Surita SC
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jun; 52():122-9. PubMed ID: 27055363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental impact of rejected materials generated in organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion plants: Comparison of wet and dry process layout.
    Colazo AB; Sánchez A; Font X; Colón J
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():84-97. PubMed ID: 26123979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emergence and fate of cyclic volatile polydimethylsiloxanes (D4, D5) in municipal waste streams: release mechanisms, partitioning and persistence in air, water, soil and sediments.
    Surita SC; Tansel B
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jan; 468-469():46-52. PubMed ID: 24012894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of leachate quality and biogas generation in simulated anaerobic and hybrid bioreactors.
    Xu Q; Tian Y; Wang S; Ko JH
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jul; 41():94-100. PubMed ID: 25857421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oxidation of siloxanes during biogas combustion and nanotoxicity of Si-based particles released to the atmosphere.
    Tansel B; Surita SC
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 24355797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative analysis of volatile methylsiloxanes in waste-to-energy landfill biogases using direct APCI-MS/MS.
    Badjagbo K; Héroux M; Alaee M; Moore S; Sauvé S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jan; 44(2):600-5. PubMed ID: 20017505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a Full-Scale Water-Based Scrubber for Removing Siloxanes from Digester Gas: A Case Study.
    Surita SC; Tansel B
    Water Environ Res; 2015 May; 87(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 26460464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing biogas production from anaerobic biodegradation of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste through leachate blending and recirculation.
    Nair A; Sartaj M; Kennedy K; Coelho NM
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Oct; 32(10):939-46. PubMed ID: 25125510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative assessment of two biotrickling filters for siloxanes removal: Effect of the addition of an organic phase.
    Pascual C; Cantera S; Muñoz R; Lebrero R
    Chemosphere; 2020 Jul; 251():126359. PubMed ID: 32151807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of on-line measurement techniques for siloxanes and other trace compounds in biogas.
    Arnold M; Kajolinna T
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jun; 30(6):1011-7. PubMed ID: 20056535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biogasification of green and food wastes using anaerobic-phased solids digester system.
    Liu G; Zhang R; El-Mashad HM; Dong R; Liu X
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2012 Sep; 168(1):78-90. PubMed ID: 21842163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consecutive anaerobic-aerobic treatment of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and lignocellulosic materials in laboratory-scale landfill-bioreactors.
    Pellera FM; Pasparakis E; Gidarakos E
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():181-9. PubMed ID: 27497587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of biogas recovery from MSW using different aerobic-anaerobic operation modes.
    Xu Q; Tian Y; Kim H; Ko JH
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():190-5. PubMed ID: 27426021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the rotary drum reactor process as pretreatment technology of municipal solid waste for thermophilic anaerobic digestion and biogas production.
    Gikas P; Zhu B; Batistatos NI; Zhang R
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jun; 216():96-104. PubMed ID: 28838769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.