133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25160736)
1. Does the extent of resection impact survival for duodenal adenocarcinoma? Analysis of 1,611 cases.
Cloyd JM; Norton JA; Visser BC; Poultsides GA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):573-80. PubMed ID: 25160736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio and total lymph node count for small bowel adenocarcinoma.
Tran TB; Qadan M; Dua MM; Norton JA; Poultsides GA; Visser BC
Surgery; 2015 Aug; 158(2):486-93. PubMed ID: 26013988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term outcomes in patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma.
Lee SY; Lee JH; Hwang DW; Kim SC; Park KM; Lee YJ
ANZ J Surg; 2014 Dec; 84(12):970-5. PubMed ID: 23656271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term results of radical resection for locally advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma.
Bucher P; Gervaz P; Morel P
Hepatogastroenterology; 2005; 52(66):1727-9. PubMed ID: 16334766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal Lymphadenectomy for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: Does the Number Alone Matter?
Sakamoto T; Saiura A; Ono Y; Mise Y; Inoue Y; Ishizawa T; Takahashi Y; Ito H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 24(11):3368-3375. PubMed ID: 28799027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simple Versus Radical Resection for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of National Cancer Database.
Platoff RM; Kellish AS; Hakim A; Gaughan JP; Atabek UM; Spitz FR; Hong YK
Am Surg; 2021 Feb; 87(2):266-275. PubMed ID: 32927979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a ten-year experience with 79 patients.
Rose DM; Hochwald SN; Klimstra DS; Brennan MF
J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Aug; 183(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 8696551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical analysis of primary duodenal adenocarcinoma: an 11-year experience.
Hung FC; Kuo CM; Chuah SK; Kuo CH; Chen YS; Lu SN; Chang Chien CS
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 May; 22(5):724-8. PubMed ID: 17444863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Duodenal localization is a negative predictor of survival after small bowel adenocarcinoma resection: A population-based, propensity score-matched analysis.
Wilhelm A; Galata C; Beutner U; Schmied BM; Warschkow R; Steffen T; Brunner W; Post S; Marti L
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 117(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 29044591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymph node evaluation is associated with improved survival after surgery for early stage gallbladder cancer.
Jensen EH; Abraham A; Jarosek S; Habermann EB; Al-Refaie WB; Vickers SA; Virnig BA; Tuttle TM
Surgery; 2009 Oct; 146(4):706-11; discussion 711-3. PubMed ID: 19789030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extent of resection in the management of duodenal adenocarcinoma.
Kaklamanos IG; Bathe OF; Franceschi D; Camarda C; Levi J; Livingstone AS
Am J Surg; 2000 Jan; 179(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 10737576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinicopathological analysis and survival outcome of duodenal adenocarcinoma.
Kim MJ; Choi SB; Han HJ; Park PJ; Kim WB; Song TJ; Suh SO; Choi SY
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 May; 30(5):254-9. PubMed ID: 24751389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of a prognostic nomogram designed for gastric cancer in predicting outcome of patients with R0 resected duodenal adenocarcinoma.
Gold JS; Tang LH; Gönen M; Coit DG; Brennan MF; Allen PJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):3159-67. PubMed ID: 17680313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic Factors and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Primary Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Experience from China.
Jiang QL; Huang XH; Chen YT; Zhang JW; Wang CF
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():6491049. PubMed ID: 28116301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic significance of histology and positive lymph node involvement following radical hysterectomy in carcinoma of the cervix.
Macdonald OK; Chen J; Dodson M; Lee CM; Gaffney DK
Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 32(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 19451800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should all patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma be considered for aggressive surgical resection?
Hurtuk MG; Devata S; Brown KM; Oshima K; Aranha GV; Pickleman J; Shoup M
Am J Surg; 2007 Mar; 193(3):319-24; discussion 324-5. PubMed ID: 17320527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical treatment of primary duodenal adenocarcinoma.
Hu JX; Miao XY; Zhong DW; Dai WD; Liu W; Hu W
Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(72):858-62. PubMed ID: 17153441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer.
Hellan M; Sun CL; Artinyan A; Mojica-Manosa P; Bhatia S; Ellenhorn JD; Kim J
Pancreas; 2008 Jul; 37(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18580439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of preoperative radiation on survival of patients with T3N0 >7-cm non-small cell lung cancers treated with anatomic resection using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.
Moreno AC; Morgensztern D; Yu JB; Boffa DJ; Decker RH; Detterbeck FC; Kim AW
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 23583079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognosis and nomogram for predicting postoperative survival of duodenal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study in China and the SEER database.
Jiang S; Zhao R; Li Y; Han X; Liu Z; Ge W; Dong Y; Han W
Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):7940. PubMed ID: 29786691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
