194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25161117)
1. Influence of occlusal loading force on occlusal contacts in natural dentition.
Imamura Y; Sato Y; Kitagawa N; Uchida K; Osawa T; Omori M; Okada Y
J Prosthodont Res; 2015 Apr; 59(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 25161117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure.
Hidaka O; Iwasaki M; Saito M; Morimoto T
J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1336-44. PubMed ID: 10403461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occlusal status of implant superstructures at mandibular first molar immediately after setting.
Okada Y; Sato Y; Kitagawa N; Uchida K; Osawa T; Imamura Y; Terazawa M
Int J Implant Dent; 2015 Dec; 1(1):16. PubMed ID: 27747638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the thickness of silicone registration material as a means for occlusal contact examination--an explorative study with different tooth clenching intensities.
Obara R; Komiyama O; Iida T; De Laat A; Kawara M
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Nov; 40(11):834-43. PubMed ID: 23889702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relation between clenching strength and occlusal force distribution in primary dentition.
Karibe H; Ogata K; Hasegawa Y; Ogihara K
J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 30(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 12588505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of occlusal contact on cervical muscle activity during submaximal clenching.
So K; Komiyama O; Arai M; Kawara M; Kobayashi K
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):417-22. PubMed ID: 15140166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of clenching level on intercuspal contact area in various regions of the dental arch.
Gurdsapsri W; Ai M; Baba K; Fueki K
J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Mar; 27(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 10784336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of occlusal contact on the level of mandibular elevator muscle activity during maximal clenching in lateral positions.
Shinogaya T; Kimura M; Matsumoto M
J Med Dent Sci; 1997 Dec; 44(4):105-12. PubMed ID: 12160202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Occlusal force distribution on the dental arch during various levels of clenching.
Kumagai H; Suzuki T; Hamada T; Sondang P; Fujitani M; Nikawa H
J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Dec; 26(12):932-5. PubMed ID: 10620156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the occlusal contact area of individual teeth during low-level clenching.
Nishimori H; Iida T; Kamiyama H; Komoda Y; Obara R; Uchida T; Kawara M; Komiyama O
J Oral Sci; 2017 Sep; 59(3):337-342. PubMed ID: 28529279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of stabilization splint on occlusal force distribution during voluntary submaximal tooth clenching: a preliminary sleep simulation study.
Suganuma T; Itoh H; Ono Y; Baba K
Cranio; 2013 Apr; 31(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 23795399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stable tooth contacts in intercuspal occlusion makes for utilities of the jaw elevators during maximal voluntary clenching.
Wang XR; Zhang Y; Xing N; Xu YF; Wang MQ
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 May; 40(5):319-28. PubMed ID: 23480460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association between near occlusal contact areas and mixing ability.
Horie T; Kanazawa M; Komagamine Y; Hama Y; Minakuchi S
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 41(11):829-35. PubMed ID: 25155067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EMG response to alteration of tooth contacts on occlusal splints during maximal clenching.
Wood WW; Tobias DL
J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Mar; 51(3):394-6. PubMed ID: 6584610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of direct and indirect occlusal contact examinations with different clenching intensities.
Komiyama O; Obara R; Iida T; Asano T; Masuda M; Uchida T; De Laat A; Kawara M
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 42(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 25270097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of proximal tooth contact tightness at rest and during clenching.
Oh SH; Nakano M; Bando E; Shigemoto S; Kori M
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):538-45. PubMed ID: 15189310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Masticatory performance is influenced by masticatory muscle activity balance and the cumulative occlusal contact area.
Nalamliang N; Sumonsiri P; Thongudomporn U
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Jun; 126():105113. PubMed ID: 33826961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of different dental articulating papers on SEMG activity during maximum clenching.
Augusti D; Augusti G; Re D; Dellavia C; Giannì AB
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2015 Aug; 25(4):612-8. PubMed ID: 25956545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association Between Contact from an Overerupted Third Molar and Bilaterally Redistributed Electromyographic Activity of the Jaw Closing Muscles.
Guo SX; Li BY; Qi K; Zhang Y; Zhou LJ; Liu L; Wang MQ
J Oral Facial Pain Headache; 2018 Fall; 32(4):358-366. PubMed ID: 30365571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
Tartaglia GM; Testori T; Pallavera A; Marelli B; Sforza C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1081-8. PubMed ID: 18828826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
