199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25162009)
1. Improved variant calling accuracy by merging replicates in whole-exome sequencing studies.
Zhang Y; Li B; Li C; Cai Q; Zheng W; Long J
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():319534. PubMed ID: 25162009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ionizing Radiation Alters the Transition/Transversion Ratio in the Exome of Human Gingiva Fibroblasts.
Nath N; Hagenau L; Weiss S; Tzvetkova A; Jensen LR; Kaderali L; Port M; Scherthan H; Kuss AW
Health Phys; 2020 Jul; 119(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 32483046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effective filtering strategies to improve data quality from population-based whole exome sequencing studies.
Carson AR; Smith EN; Matsui H; Brækkan SK; Jepsen K; Hansen JB; Frazer KA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 May; 15():125. PubMed ID: 24884706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling.
Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B
BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals.
Cheng AY; Teo YY; Ong RT
Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1707-13. PubMed ID: 24558117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced whole exome sequencing by higher DNA insert lengths.
Pommerenke C; Geffers R; Bunk B; Bhuju S; Eberth S; Drexler HG; Quentmeier H
BMC Genomics; 2016 May; 17():399. PubMed ID: 27225215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance assessment of variant calling pipelines using human whole exome sequencing and simulated data.
Kumaran M; Subramanian U; Devarajan B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31208315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An efficient and tunable parameter to improve variant calling for whole genome and exome sequencing data.
Ahn YJ; Markkandan K; Baek IP; Mun S; Lee W; Kim HS; Han K
Genes Genomics; 2018 Jan; 40(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 29892897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes.
Trubetskoy V; Rodriguez A; Dave U; Campbell N; Crawford EL; Cook EH; Sutcliffe JS; Foster I; Madduri R; Cox NJ; Davis LK
Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation and assessment of variant calling pipelines for next-generation sequencing.
Pirooznia M; Kramer M; Parla J; Goes FS; Potash JB; McCombie WR; Zandi PP
Hum Genomics; 2014 Jul; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 25078893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analytical validation of whole exome and whole genome sequencing for clinical applications.
Linderman MD; Brandt T; Edelmann L; Jabado O; Kasai Y; Kornreich R; Mahajan M; Shah H; Kasarskis A; Schadt EE
BMC Med Genomics; 2014 Apr; 7():20. PubMed ID: 24758382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. OTG-snpcaller: an optimized pipeline based on TMAP and GATK for SNP calling from ion torrent data.
Zhu P; He L; Li Y; Huang W; Xi F; Lin L; Zhi Q; Zhang W; Tang YT; Geng C; Lu Z; Xu X
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e97507. PubMed ID: 24824529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal sequencing depth design for whole genome re-sequencing in pigs.
Jiang Y; Jiang Y; Wang S; Zhang Q; Ding X
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):556. PubMed ID: 31703550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PhredEM: a phred-score-informed genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies.
Liao P; Satten GA; Hu YJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):375-387. PubMed ID: 28560825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimized detection of insertions/deletions (INDELs) in whole-exome sequencing data.
Kim BY; Park JH; Jo HY; Koo SK; Park MH
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182272. PubMed ID: 28792971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of whole genome amplification techniques for human single cell exome sequencing.
Borgström E; Paterlini M; Mold JE; Frisen J; Lundeberg J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171566. PubMed ID: 28207771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Archived neonatal dried blood spot samples can be used for accurate whole genome and exome-targeted next-generation sequencing.
Hollegaard MV; Grauholm J; Nielsen R; Grove J; Mandrup S; Hougaard DM
Mol Genet Metab; 2013; 110(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 23830478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GATK hard filtering: tunable parameters to improve variant calling for next generation sequencing targeted gene panel data.
De Summa S; Malerba G; Pinto R; Mori A; Mijatovic V; Tommasi S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 5):119. PubMed ID: 28361668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
