195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25162778)
1. Utility of repeated assessment after invalid baseline neurocognitive test performance.
Schatz P; Kelley T; Ott SD; Solomon GS; Elbin RJ; Higgins K; Moser RS
J Athl Train; 2014; 49(5):659-64. PubMed ID: 25162778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of invalid computerized baseline neurocognitive test results in high school and collegiate athletes.
Schatz P; Moser RS; Solomon GS; Ott SD; Karpf R
J Athl Train; 2012; 47(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 22892410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rates and Predictors of Invalid Baseline Test Performance in High School and Collegiate Athletes for 3 Computerized Neurocognitive Tests: ANAM, Axon Sports, and ImPACT.
Nelson LD; Pfaller AY; Rein LE; McCrea MA
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):2018-26. PubMed ID: 26059178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age and test setting affect the prevalence of invalid baseline scores on neurocognitive tests.
Lichtenstein JD; Moser RS; Schatz P
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Feb; 42(2):479-84. PubMed ID: 24243771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Valid but Invalid: Suboptimal ImPACT Baseline Performance in University Athletes.
Walton SR; Broshek DK; Freeman JR; Cullum CM; Resch JE
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1377-1384. PubMed ID: 29485429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Collegiate Student Athletes With History of ADHD or Academic Difficulties Are More Likely to Produce an Invalid Protocol on Baseline ImPACT Testing.
Manderino L; Gunstad J
Clin J Sport Med; 2018 Mar; 28(2):111-116. PubMed ID: 28731886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of invalid ImPACT baseline test results among high school athletes with invalidity and sandbagging indices.
Tsushima WT; Lawton DRY; Kimata C; Siu AM
Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 Oct; 37(7):1516-1529. PubMed ID: 36458597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes.
MacDonald J; Duerson D
Clin J Sport Med; 2015 Jul; 25(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Relation Between Testing Environment and Baseline Performance in Child and Adolescent Concussion Assessment.
Vaughan CG; Gerst EH; Sady MD; Newman JB; Gioia GA
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jul; 42(7):1716-23. PubMed ID: 24787043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The prevalence and correlates of scores falling below ImPACT embedded validity indicators among adolescent student athletes.
Liu BC; Iverson GL; Cook NE; Schatz P; Berkner P; Gaudet CE
Clin Neuropsychol; 2024 Jul; 38(5):1175-1192. PubMed ID: 38233364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Baseline Neurocognitive Performance and Clearance for Athletes to Return to Contact.
Asken BM; Clugston JR; Snyder AR; Bauer RM
J Athl Train; 2017 Jan; 52(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 27905859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of Invalid Performance on Baseline Testing for Sport-Related Concussion by Age and Validity Indicator.
Abeare CA; Messa I; Zuccato BG; Merker B; Erdodi L
JAMA Neurol; 2018 Jun; 75(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 29532050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitivity and specificity of the online version of ImPACT in high school and collegiate athletes.
Schatz P; Sandel N
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 23144368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of baseline and post-concussion ImPACT test scores in young athletes with stimulant-treated and untreated ADHD.
Gardner RM; Yengo-Kahn A; Bonfield CM; Solomon GS
Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Feb; 45(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 27736285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Examination of Adolescent Athletes and Nonathletes on Baseline Neuropsychological Test Scores.
Tomczyk CP; Mormile M; Wittenberg MS; Langdon JL; Hunt TN
J Athl Train; 2018 Apr; 53(4):404-409. PubMed ID: 29543036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supervision and computerized neurocognitive baseline test performance in high school athletes: an initial investigation.
Kuhn AW; Solomon GS
J Athl Train; 2014; 49(6):800-5. PubMed ID: 25299577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Group versus individual administration affects baseline neurocognitive test performance.
Moser RS; Schatz P; Neidzwski K; Ott SD
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2325-30. PubMed ID: 21828367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Test Environment, Age, Sex, and Sport on Baseline Computerized Neurocognitive Test Performance.
French J; Huber P; McShane J; Holland CL; Elbin RJ; Kontos AP
Am J Sports Med; 2019 Nov; 47(13):3263-3269. PubMed ID: 31609635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-reported history of seizure and baseline neurocognitive test performance in student-athletes: an initial investigation.
Zalneraitis BH; Yengo-Kahn AM; Pawlukiewicz AJ; Solomon GS
Phys Sportsmed; 2017 Nov; 45(4):470-474. PubMed ID: 28838286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Baseline neurocognitive scores in athletes with attention deficit-spectrum disorders and/or learning disability.
Zuckerman SL; Lee YM; Odom MJ; Solomon GS; Sills AK
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2013 Aug; 12(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23790088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
