These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25163510)

  • 1. Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Bewick ER; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3082-94. PubMed ID: 25163510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive character displacement of epicuticular compounds and their contribution to mate choice in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens.
    Dyer KA; White BE; Sztepanacz JL; Bewick ER; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1163-75. PubMed ID: 24351014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproductive character displacement of female mate preferences for male cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Rundle HD; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2625-37. PubMed ID: 26299584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila.
    Jaenike J; Dyer KA; Cornish C; Minhas MS
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Oct; 4(10):e325. PubMed ID: 17032063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of reproductive isolation in the
    Humphreys DP; Rundle HD; Dyer KA
    Curr Zool; 2016 Apr; 62(2):183-191. PubMed ID: 29491905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fine-scale geographic patterns of gene flow and reproductive character displacement in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens.
    Dyer KA; Bewick ER; White BE; Bray MJ; Humphreys DP
    Mol Ecol; 2018 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 30074656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An experimental test of the evolutionary consequences of sympatry in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Jarvis WMC; Arthur NJ; Rundle HD; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2024 Feb; 78(3):555-565. PubMed ID: 38153840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Divergence of premating behaviors in the closely related species Drosophila subquinaria and D. recens.
    Giglio EM; Dyer KA
    Ecol Evol; 2013 Feb; 3(2):365-74. PubMed ID: 23467696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
    Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ongoing hybridization obscures phylogenetic relationships in the Drosophila subquinaria species complex.
    Ginsberg PS; Humphreys DP; Dyer KA
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1093-1105. PubMed ID: 31385638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.
    Arthur NJ; Dyer KA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time in a bottle: the evolutionary fate of species discrimination in sibling Drosophila species.
    Myers EM; Frankino WA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31759. PubMed ID: 22384069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymmetrical patterns of speciation uniquely support reinforcement in Drosophila.
    Yukilevich R
    Evolution; 2012 May; 66(5):1430-46. PubMed ID: 22519782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The search for causal traits of speciation: Divergent female mate preferences target male courtship song, not pheromones, in Drosophila athabasca species complex.
    Yukilevich R; Harvey T; Nguyen S; Kehlbeck J; Park A
    Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 26831347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interspecific interactions and learning variability jointly drive geographic differences in mate preferences.
    Verzijden MN; Svensson EI
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1896-903. PubMed ID: 27302691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
    Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behavioral Isolation due to Cascade Reinforcement in Lucania Killifish.
    Kozak GM; Roland G; Rankhorn C; Falater A; Berdan EL; Fuller RC
    Am Nat; 2015 Apr; 185(4):491-506. PubMed ID: 25811084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reinforcement generates reproductive isolation between neighbouring conspecific populations of spadefoot toads.
    Pfennig KS; Rice AM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140949. PubMed ID: 24990680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolution of choosiness dictates whether search costs of mate choice enhance speciation by sexual selection.
    Yukilevich R; Aoki F
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Aug; 35(8):1045-1059. PubMed ID: 35830473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Male mate choice via cuticular hydrocarbon pheromones drives reproductive isolation between Drosophila species.
    Shahandeh MP; Pischedda A; Turner TL
    Evolution; 2018 Jan; 72(1):123-135. PubMed ID: 29098691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.