These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25163648)

  • 1. Estimation of treatment effects in matched-pair cluster randomized trials by calibrating covariate imbalance between clusters.
    Wu Z; Frangakis CE; Louis TA; Scharfstein DO
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1014-22. PubMed ID: 25163648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.
    Candlish J; Teare MD; Dimairo M; Flight L; Mandefield L; Walters SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 30314463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How large are the consequences of covariate imbalance in cluster randomized trials: a simulation study with a continuous outcome and a binary covariate at the cluster level.
    Moerbeek M; van Schie S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():79. PubMed ID: 27401771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Switching cluster membership in cluster randomized control trials: Implications for design and analysis.
    Schweig JD; Pane JF; McCaffrey DF
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):516-534. PubMed ID: 32271041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clarifying selection bias in cluster randomized trials.
    Li F; Tian Z; Bobb J; Papadogeorgou G; Li F
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 34894795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of baseline covariate imbalance on bias in treatment effect estimation in cluster randomized trials: Race as an example.
    Yang S; Starks MA; Hernandez AF; Turner EL; Califf RM; O'Connor CM; Mentz RJ; Roy Choudhury K
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Jan; 88():105775. PubMed ID: 31228563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Augmented generalized estimating equations for improving efficiency and validity of estimation in cluster randomized trials by leveraging cluster-level and individual-level covariates.
    Stephens AJ; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; De Gruttola V
    Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(10):915-30. PubMed ID: 22359361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive pair-matching in randomized trials with unbiased and efficient effect estimation.
    Balzer LB; Petersen ML; van der Laan MJ;
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):999-1011. PubMed ID: 25421503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a covariate-constrained randomization procedure in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Chaussee EL; Dickinson LM; Fairclough DL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 105():106409. PubMed ID: 33894362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-Stage TMLE to reduce bias and improve efficiency in cluster randomized trials.
    Balzer LB; van der Laan M; Ayieko J; Kamya M; Chamie G; Schwab J; Havlir DV; Petersen ML
    Biostatistics; 2023 Apr; 24(2):502-517. PubMed ID: 34939083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accounting for interactions and complex inter-subject dependency in estimating treatment effect in cluster-randomized trials with missing outcomes.
    Prague M; Wang R; Stephens A; Tchetgen Tchetgen E; DeGruttola V
    Biometrics; 2016 Dec; 72(4):1066-1077. PubMed ID: 27060877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomization inference for balanced cluster-randomized trials.
    Raab GM; Butcher I
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 16279135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restricted randomization of ZAMSTAR: a 2 x 2 factorial cluster randomized trial.
    Sismanidis C; Moulton LH; Ayles H; Fielding K; Schaap A; Beyers N; Bond G; Godfrey-Faussett P; Hayes R
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):316-27. PubMed ID: 18697846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intent-to-treat analysis of cluster randomized trials when clusters report unidentifiable outcome proportions.
    DeSantis SM; Li R; Zhang Y; Wang X; Vernon SW; Tilley BC; Koch G
    Clin Trials; 2020 Dec; 17(6):627-636. PubMed ID: 32838555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size considerations for stratified cluster randomization design with binary outcomes and varying cluster size.
    Xu X; Zhu H; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3395-3404. PubMed ID: 31033011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimisation for the design of parallel cluster-randomised trials: An evaluation of balance in cluster-level covariates and numbers of clusters allocated to each arm.
    Martin J; Middleton L; Hemming K
    Clin Trials; 2023 Apr; 20(2):111-120. PubMed ID: 36661245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials.
    Nixon RM; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2673-92. PubMed ID: 12939779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changing cluster composition in cluster randomised controlled trials: design and analysis considerations.
    Corrigan N; Bankart MJ; Gray LJ; Smith KL
    Trials; 2014 May; 15():184. PubMed ID: 24884591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When should matching be used in the design of cluster randomized trials?
    Chondros P; Ukoumunne OC; Gunn JM; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(26):5765-5778. PubMed ID: 34390264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.